* Fix tabs/spaces mismatch for certain rows
* Insert lines between header files to improve legibility
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: George Dunlap
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Stefano Stabellini
CC: Julien Grall
---
xen/include/xlat.lst | 31 +++
1 file changed,
RFC. In theory this is a great way to avoid some of the spiketraps involved
with C being the official representation.
However, this doesn't build. gnttab_transfer has a layout that requires a
CONFIG_COMPAT if we want to satisfy -Wpadding for both forms of the structure.
Thoughts on whether
This subop appears to have been missed from the compat checks.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: George Dunlap
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Stefano Stabellini
CC: Julien Grall
---
xen/common/compat/grant_table.c | 4
xen/include/xlat.lst| 1 +
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: George Dunlap
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Stefano Stabellini
CC: Julien Grall
---
xen/include/xlat.lst | 40
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/include/xlat.lst b/xen/include/xlat.lst
index
This started off as patch 3, and grew somewhat.
Patches 1-3 are simple and hopefully non-controversial.
Patch 4 is an attempt to make the headers less fragile, but came with an
unexpected complication. Details in the patch.
Andrew Cooper (4):
xen/xlat: Sort out whitespace
xen/xlat: Sort
On 15/04/2024 3:14 pm, George Dunlap wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Some of you may have noticed that xenbis.xenproject.org/xsa/ doesn't
> currently list XSA-456. This has prompted me to rewrite the perl code
> which generates that area of the webpage into golang, which is much
> easier for the current
flight 185556 xen-4.16-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185556/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-prev
Le 15/04/2024 à 14:15, Teddy Astie a écrit :
> All hardware that supports VT-d/AMD-Vi that exists also supports cx16 (aside
> specifically crafted virtual machines).
>
> Some IOMMU code paths in Xen consider cases where VT-d/AMD-Vi is supported
> while cx16 isn't, those paths may be bugged and are
flight 185536 xen-4.17-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185536/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-prev
Reporting whether the BHB clearing on entry is done for the different domains
types based on cpu_has_bhb_seq is incorrect, as that variable signals whether
there's a BHB clearing sequence selected, but that alone doesn't imply that
such sequence is used from the PV and/or HVM entry points.
flight 185597 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185597/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-prev
On 15/04/2024 10:56 am, Federico Serafini wrote:
> Mark the whole gzip folder as adopted code and remove the redundant
> deviation of file inflate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper
I hadn't realised that we had a special case like this. Definitely
better to get rid
Hey all,
Some of you may have noticed that xenbis.xenproject.org/xsa/ doesn't
currently list XSA-456. This has prompted me to rewrite the perl code
which generates that area of the webpage into golang, which is much
easier for the current security team to understand and modify. The
draft
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:03:30 +
Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Petr Tesařík Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 5:50 AM
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:23:22 +
> > Michael Kelley wrote:
> >
> > > From: Petr Tesařík Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 4:46
> > > AM
> > > >
> > > > Hi Michael,
>
flight 185603 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185603/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-pvops
flight 185604 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185604/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-pvops
flight 185616 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185616/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-pvops
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> This subop appears to have been missed from the compat checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
> ---
> CC: George Dunlap
> CC: Jan Beulich
> CC: Stefano Stabellini
> CC: Julien Grall
> ---
> xen/common/compat/grant_table.c | 4
>
flight 185527 xen-4.18-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185527/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-prev
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> * Fix tabs/spaces mismatch for certain rows
> * Insert lines between header files to improve legibility
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
> ---
> CC: George Dunlap
> CC: Jan Beulich
> CC: Stefano Stabellini
> CC: Julien Grall
> ---
>
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
flight 185617 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185617/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-pvops
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> RFC. In theory this is a great way to avoid some of the spiketraps involved
> with C being the official representation.
>
> However, this doesn't build. gnttab_transfer has a layout that requires a
> CONFIG_COMPAT if we want to satisfy -Wpadding for
flight 185622 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185622/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-vhd 12 debian-di-installfail REGR. vs. 185281
flight 185623 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185623/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 185287
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 20
Hi Luca,
On 09/04/2024 12:45, Luca Fancellu wrote:
Currently Xen is not exporting the static shared memory regions
to the device tree as /memory node, this commit is fixing this
issue.
The static shared memory banks can be part of the memory range
available for the domain, so if they are
flight 185624 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185624/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 5ba3602e4580d6b65dacf4292a031627f93e1167
baseline version:
ovmf
flight 185540 linux-5.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185540/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-pvops
flight 185570 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185570/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-pvops
Hi Bertrand,
On 15/04/2024 08:48, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Julien,
On 12 Apr 2024, at 19:01, Julien Grall wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 11:30, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Julien,
On 12 Apr 2024, at 15:53, Julien Grall wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 18:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi John,
I saw this patch was committed. I have one question this may require
some adjustment.
On 08/04/2024 17:11, John Ernberg wrote:
---
xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile | 1 +
xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c | 139
2 files changed, 140 insertions(+)
Hi,
On 10/04/2024 00:26, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
From 28f83c4ec0c0b5c1e7eb2bd8bc5dc3190314a5b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Stabellini
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:19:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] public: s/int/int32_t
Straightforward int -> int32_t and unsigned int -> uint32_t
Hi,
On 08/04/2024 16:03, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
TI K3 devices (J721E, J721S2, AM62X .etc) have the same variant
of UART as OMAP4. Add the compatible used in Linux device tree,
"ti,am654-uart" to the OMAP UART dt_match so that the driver can
be used with these devices. Also, enable the driver
Mark the whole gzip folder as adopted code and remove the redundant
deviation of file inflate.
Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini
---
automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl | 5 -
docs/misra/exclude-list.json | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6
On 15/04/2024 11:25 am, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I saw this patch was committed. I have one question this may require
> some adjustment.
>
> On 08/04/2024 17:11, John Ernberg wrote:
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile | 1 +
>> xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c | 139
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 04:11:21PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> The current timeout of 40s seems to be too low for AMD boxes (pinots and
> rimavas) in the lab after XSA-455, see:
There's something else we can tweak if only some machine need extra
time, it is an host property "TimeoutFactor",
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 09:15:51AM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 04:11:21PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > The current timeout of 40s seems to be too low for AMD boxes (pinots and
> > rimavas) in the lab after XSA-455, see:
>
> There's something else we can tweak if
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 09:17:08AM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> buster-backport isn't available on the main mirror anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné
Please push ASAP.
Thanks, Roger.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:33:19AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 09:15:51AM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 04:11:21PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > > The current timeout of 40s seems to be too low for AMD boxes (pinots and
> > > rimavas) in
flight 185571 linux-6.1 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185571/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-pvops
Hi Julien,
> On 12 Apr 2024, at 19:01, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 11:30, Bertrand Marquis
> wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> > On 12 Apr 2024, at 15:53, Julien Grall wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 18:08, Stefano Stabellini
> > wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Apr
flight 185560 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185560/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-pvops
buster-backport isn't available on the main mirror anymore.
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
---
Notes:
I've tested the patch already, so I'll push that soon.
production-config | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/production-config b/production-config
index
flight 185564 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185564/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-prev
flight 185567 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185567/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-prev
On 15/04/2024 11:50, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 15/04/2024 11:25 am, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi John,
I saw this patch was committed. I have one question this may require
some adjustment.
On 08/04/2024 17:11, John Ernberg wrote:
---
xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile | 1 +
flight 185590 xen-4.15-testing running [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185590/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-prev
Hi Julien,
On 4/15/24 1:03 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 15/04/2024 11:50, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 15/04/2024 11:25 am, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> I saw this patch was committed. I have one question this may require
>>> some adjustment.
>>>
>>> On 08/04/2024 17:11, John
Hi everyone,
We all have a responsibility and pledge to make this community a welcoming
environment.
As such, I would like to request we keep the Code of Conduct and patch
discussions separate.
Should there be a need for any Code of Conduct complaints/investigations,
this will be treated
flight 185585 xen-unstable running [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185585/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-prev
flight 185582 linux-linus running [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185582/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-pvops
Hi Julien,
> On 15 Apr 2024, at 12:08, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> On 15/04/2024 08:48, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Hi Julien,
>>> On 12 Apr 2024, at 19:01, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 11:30, Bertrand Marquis
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi Julien,
>>>
flight 185577 linux-5.4 running [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185577/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-pvops
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 21:11:41 -0700
mhkelle...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Michael Kelley
>
> Currently swiotlb_tbl_map_single() takes alloc_align_mask and
> alloc_size arguments to specify an swiotlb allocation that is
> larger than mapping_size. This larger allocation is used solely
> by
Hi John,
On 15/04/2024 12:17, John Ernberg wrote:
Hi Julien,
On 4/15/24 1:03 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 15/04/2024 11:50, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 15/04/2024 11:25 am, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi John,
I saw this patch was committed. I have one question this may require
some adjustment.
On
This flag was only used in case cx16 is not available, as those code paths no
longer exist, this flag now does basically nothing.
Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie
---
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c | 12 +++-
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/vtd.h | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 5
All hardware with VT-d has CMPXCHG16B support. Check this at initialisation
time, and remove the effectively-dead logic for the non-cx16 case.
Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper
Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie
---
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c | 73 ++---
1 file changed, 25
All hardware with AMD-Vi has CMPXCHG16 support. Check this at initialisation
time, and remove the effectively-dead logic for the non-cx16 case.
Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper
Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie
---
xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c | 42 +++--
All hardware with VT-d has CMPXCHG16B support. Check this at initialisation
time, and remove the effectively-dead logic for the non-cx16 case.
Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper
Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie
---
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c | 70 --
All hardware that supports VT-d/AMD-Vi that exists also supports cx16 (aside
specifically crafted virtual machines).
Some IOMMU code paths in Xen consider cases where VT-d/AMD-Vi is supported
while cx16 isn't, those paths may be bugged and are barely tested, dead code
in practice.
Disable IOMMU
All hardware with AMD-Vi has CMPXCHG16 support. Check this at initialisation
time, and remove the effectively-dead logic for the non-cx16 case.
Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper
Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie
---
xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_intr.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff
From: Petr Tesařík Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 4:46 AM
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> sorry for taking so long to answer. Yes, there was no agreement on the
> removal of the "dir" parameter, but I'm not sure it's because of
> symmetry with swiotlb_sync_*(), because the topic was not really
> discussed.
>
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:23:22 +
Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Petr Tesařík Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 4:46 AM
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > sorry for taking so long to answer. Yes, there was no agreement on the
> > removal of the "dir" parameter, but I'm not sure it's because of
> >
From: Petr Tesařík Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 5:50 AM
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:23:22 +
> Michael Kelley wrote:
>
> > From: Petr Tesařík Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 4:46 AM
> > >
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > sorry for taking so long to answer. Yes, there was no agreement on the
> > >
flight 185595 linux-6.1 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/185595/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 broken
build-amd64-pvops
65 matches
Mail list logo
