Re: Different approach to KDE and XFCE desktop testing?

On 1/8/19 5:06 AM, Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > * The list of pre-installed applications could be pruned of those > which don't make much sense for that particular purpose (e.g. CD > writing software on ARM, or perhaps on any system nowadays). Certainly a good thing to do. > *

Re: Different approach to KDE and XFCE desktop testing?

Sending email from Pavlin because he is not a member of the group and message is rejected. -- QUESTIONS How do we test desktop applications? On what architectures do we test? What problems can arise when trying to follow the test case? I will provide you with brief answer. WHAT DO WE TEST? We

Re: Different approach to KDE and XFCE desktop testing?

Perhaps automation needs to be implemented. CC-ing Pavlin that I think can advise about automation strategies. Johannes Lips wrote on 1/8/19 12:17 PM: > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:08 AM Lukas Ruzicka > wrote: > > Hello KDE and XFCE teams, > > I am

Re: Different approach to KDE and XFCE desktop testing?

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:08 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Hello KDE and XFCE teams, > > I am writing to you on behalf of the Fedora QA team, because you are the > stakeholders of release-blocking desktop environments in Fedora. > > We believe that there is need to revisit and review some of the

Different approach to KDE and XFCE desktop testing?

Hello KDE and XFCE teams, I am writing to you on behalf of the Fedora QA team, because you are the stakeholders of release-blocking desktop environments in Fedora. We believe that there is need to revisit and review some of the approaches we have in desktop testing. I hope that I can clarify in

Re: Rawhide Xfce Spin

On 08. 01. 19 1:05, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On 1/7/19 3:59 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: On 1/7/19 11:21 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: Is there any build of rawhide Xfce spin? I cannot fins one here: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Spins/x86_64/iso/ What would be the