On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 15:47 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
Just asking. Is there any use for fontcacheproto and
libXfontcache in 7.5 ?
Good question - I don't really know. I see from searching the
git logs the server support for fontcache was dropped last
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:58PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
(xkbproto isn't yet, but I'm leaving that for Daniel to decide if
the changes sitting in git are ready to go and should be included
in 7.5 or wait until later.)
All I'm seeing in master since 1.0.3 is a
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:58PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
(xkbproto isn't yet, but I'm leaving that for Daniel to decide if
the changes sitting in git are ready to go and should be included
in 7.5 or wait until later.)
All I'm seeing in master since 1.0.3 is a change from #defines to
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I am proposing dropping two more modules from the katamari, now that
the X server has dropped support for the XFree86-Misc extension:
- xf86miscproto
- libXxf86misc
Again, if anyone has a good reason to retain these in the katamari,
On Oct 9, 2009, at 22:01, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
All the libraries on the list are released.
I notice these omissions from releases, and just want to make sure
they are intentional:
libXevie ... RIP
libxkbui ... ???
libXp... RIP
libXtrap ... RIP
Almost all the protocol modules are
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Oct 9, 2009, at 22:01, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
All the libraries on the list are released.
I notice these omissions from releases, and just want to make sure they
are intentional:
libXevie ... RIP
libxkbui ... ???
libXp... RIP
libXtrap ... RIP
The
Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
Just asking. Is there any use for fontcacheproto and
libXfontcache in 7.5 ?
Good question - I don't really know. I see from searching the
git logs the server support for fontcache was dropped last year,
but it didn't make it into the dead extensions list in the
Alan Coopersmith wrote, around this time last week:
[... ] at the rate we're going, we should have the
X11R7.5 release finished by this time next week.
And in full keeping with the finest traditions of X.Org, the date
I made up out of whole cloth was shockingly missed. (I may have
gotten a
On Saturday 03 October 2009 04:15:12 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
katamari,
now is the time to speak, as at the rate we're going,
Didier Spaier wrote:
On Saturday 03 October 2009 04:15:12 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
katamari,
now is the time to speak, as at the
On Saturday 03 October 2009 10:42:15 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Didier Spaier wrote:
On Saturday 03 October 2009 04:15:12 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should
Didier Spaier wrote:
Thanks for the explanation Alan. I just can't find any clear definition of
katamari in Xorg's context, searching the wiki as well as this mailing list
:-\
Sorry, it's what we call the X11R7.x releases in which we roll up a set of
individually released modules (the X
On Saturday 03 October 2009 11:11:32 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Didier Spaier wrote:
Thanks for the explanation Alan. I just can't find any clear definition
of katamari in Xorg's context, searching the wiki as well as this
mailing list
:-\
Sorry, it's what we call the X11R7.x releases in
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:15:12 -0700
From: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
katamari,
now is the time to speak,
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 06:39:50PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
xf86-input-evdev 2.0.4*
xf86-input-joystick 1.3.2*
xf86-input-keyboard 1.3.1*
xf86-input-mouse 1.3.0*
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Now that whot has heroically finished the xserver-1.7 release, we're
nearing the finish line for the X11R7.5 release.
...
I'm uncertain about xf86-video-openchrome - it's not had a new release since
last year, so I don't know if it's compatible with the Xorg ABI
On Saturday 03 October 2009, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:15:12 -0700
From: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:13:57AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 03 October 2009, Mark Kettenis wrote:
I still use xinit/startx to start X, and very much *do* consider it to
be an essential part of X.
+1000, Amen and hip hip hooray. I have never started X any other way, and
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
katamari,
now is the time to speak, as at the
On Saturday 03 October 2009, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:13:57AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 03 October 2009, Mark Kettenis wrote:
I still use xinit/startx to start X, and very much *do* consider it to
be an essential part of X.
+1000, Amen and hip hip hooray. I
Now that whot has heroically finished the xserver-1.7 release, we're
nearing the finish line for the X11R7.5 release.
I've taken the modules.txt list from the 7.4 katamari and compared to
the output of my announcement scraper script and git status scripts
to come up with the following list of
If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
katamari,
now is the time to speak, as at the rate we're going, we should have
the
X11R7.5 release finished by this time next week.
...
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
If anyone disagrees with these, or the module versions listed as being
a stable, X11R7.5-compatible version that should be included in the
katamari,
now is the time to speak, as at the rate we're going, we should have the
X11R7.5 release finished by this time next
One more proposed removal:
trapproto 3.4.3*
Since the X server no longer supports XTrap, and we've determined
it's obsolete/replaced by Record+Test [1], drop it.
[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-June/036131.html
--
-Alan
24 matches
Mail list logo
