Re: libX11 and libXext (at least) fail using prefix on make install

2011-06-29 Thread Garry Iglesias
Thank you... Sorry I was budy on ms windows dev for a while... Yes I didn't need the doc and the lib was installed anyway, it's just it tagged a failure on my dependency install. Garry. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:12 AM,

Re: libX11 and libXext (at least) fail using prefix on make install

2011-06-29 Thread Garry Iglesias
Ok Thanks ! I might disable doc install as it's only a 'private local dependancy' of a framework. Bests Garry. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote: ** On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 03:46 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Garry

libX11 and libXext (at least) fail using prefix on make install

2011-06-21 Thread Garry Iglesias
Hi, Sorry if this problem has already been mentioned, but I couldn't find any question nor bug about it... I'm building a libX11 and libXext as static libraries in a local tree as third party dependencies of a framework I'm working on. It's been working like a charm for 3 years, but I recently

Re: libX11 and libXext (at least) fail using prefix on make install

2011-06-21 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Garry Iglesias garry.igles...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Sorry if this problem has already been mentioned, but I couldn't find any question nor bug about it... I'm building a libX11 and libXext as static libraries in a local tree as third party dependencies of a

Re: libX11 and libXext (at least) fail using prefix on make install

2011-06-21 Thread Gaetan Nadon
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 03:46 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Garry Iglesias garry.igles...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Sorry if this problem has already been mentioned, but I couldn't find any question nor bug about it... I'm building a libX11 and libXext as