hi arun,
unfortunately, since i wasn't able to get my system to suspend properly,
i ended up just going with a multiscreen set-up. that works fine for my
needs, and since hibernat is very important for me, I just decided to go
with that.
Hopefully someone more knowledgeable on the list will
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:45:27PM -0400, Matt Price wrote:
i never got it to work. it's a shame, because i still consider
hibernate an essential element of the system. there's work right now to
merge tuxonice, finally, but the truth is that this functionality has
never been taken seriously
Matt Price wrote:
hi,
snip
So i'm wondering: does anyone out there have a multiseat system that
actually can suspend and hibernate successfully? And if so, do you use
the -sharevts switch when starting X, or do you have some other trick
for getting the x sessions to display simultaneously?
Hugo Vanwoerkom escreveu:
Matt Price wrote:
hi,
snip
So i'm wondering: does anyone out there have a multiseat system that
actually can suspend and hibernate successfully? And if so, do you use
the -sharevts switch when starting X, or do you have some other trick
for getting the x sessions
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 14:29 -0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom escreveu:
Matt Price wrote:
hi,
snip
So i'm wondering: does anyone out there have a multiseat system that
actually can suspend and hibernate successfully? And if so, do you use
the -sharevts switch when
-Original Message-
From: xorg-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:xorg-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
Tiago Vignatti
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:29 AM
To: Hugo Vanwoerkom
Cc: x...@freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: multiseat, -sharevts, and suspend/hibernate
Mix
McDonald, Michael-p7438c escreveu:
I'm confused. What does rootless servers have to do with multiseat?
In the current implementation, multiseat implies in several servers in
parallel, which in turn implies in hardware accesses in parallel (mostly
not coordinated by anyone), which in turn
-Original Message-
From: Tiago Vignatti [mailto:vigna...@freedesktop.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 2:02 PM
To: McDonald, Michael-p7438c
Cc: x...@freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: multiseat, -sharevts, and suspend/hibernate
McDonald, Michael-p7438c escreveu:
I'm confused
, -sharevts, and suspend/hibernate
McDonald, Michael-p7438c escreveu:
I'm confused. What does rootless servers have to do with
multiseat?
In the current implementation, multiseat implies in several
servers in
parallel, which in turn implies in hardware accesses in
parallel (mostly
-Original Message-
From: Dan Nicholson [mailto:dbn.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:51 PM
To: McDonald, Michael-p7438c
Cc: vigna...@freedesktop.org; x...@freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: multiseat, -sharevts, and suspend/hibernate
If your server is rootless, than
Subject: Re: multiseat, -sharevts, and suspend/hibernate
If your server is rootless, than by necessity it must properly obtain
resources and will not be allowed to stomp on another processes'
resources.
Ahhh. You're defining the kernel's KMS screen as the root window,
therefore all window systems
-Original Message-
From: Dan Nicholson [mailto:dbn.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:48 PM
To: McDonald, Michael-p7438c
Cc: vigna...@freedesktop.org; x...@freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: multiseat, -sharevts, and suspend/hibernate
No, I was thinking more
12 matches
Mail list logo
