[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder2][PATCH] schedulers: ensure correct branch is used for meta-exein for nanbield

From: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- schedulers.py | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/schedulers.py b/schedulers.py index a30383f255a1..47eedde016cf 100644 --- a/schedulers.py +++ b/schedulers.py @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ branchdefaults = {

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder2][PATCH] schedulers: drop meta-oe-mirror and reproducible-meta-oe from SWAT monitoring

From: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- schedulers.py | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/schedulers.py b/schedulers.py index 9ffa88f5f384..5ddcc7a68ce9 100644 --- a/schedulers.py +++ b/schedulers.py @@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ def repos_for_builder(buildername):

[yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] config.json: meta-agl now needs meta-oe

From: Alexandre Belloni rng-tools has been moved to meta-oe and is a dependency of packagegroup-agl-core-boot Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- config.json | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/config.json b/config.json index 4686068dc5b6..b92a4f237c96

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder2][PATCH] schedulers: use proper bitbake repo and branch for abelloni-next

From: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- schedulers.py | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/schedulers.py b/schedulers.py index 5c2ba5e1b8bd..c14b7678b5fd 100644 --- a/schedulers.py +++ b/schedulers.py @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ branchdefaults = {

[yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] [nanbield] config.json: use nanbield for meta-virtualization

From: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- config.json | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/config.json b/config.json index 0e002966a959..f0d85f1b21b7 100644 --- a/config.json +++ b/config.json @@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ },

Re: [yocto] Forcing uninative?

Hello, On 20/09/2023 13:59:54-0700, Rudolf J Streif wrote: > I need to resurrect a Yocto Project build environment based on honister. My > dev system has since moved on to a newer glibc etc. As expected, I am > getting this warning > > WARNING: Your host glibc version (2.37) is newer than that

Re: [yocto] Memory requirements for building images with different architectures

On 08/09/2023 09:06:39+0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 8:42 AM Yoann Congal wrote: > > > Hi! > > Le ven. 8 sept. 2023 à 08:01, MOHAMMED HASSAN > > a écrit : > > > >> Right, you're not the only one! > >> See > >> > >>

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder-helper][PATCH 0/3] fix test results storage for mickledore

On 14/06/2023 15:32:25+0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 16:29 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 14/06/2023 14:15:54+0200, Alexis Lothoré wrote: > > > On 6/14/23 12:31, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 10:56 +0200, Alexis Lothoré via > > > >

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder-helper][PATCH 0/3] fix test results storage for mickledore

On 14/06/2023 14:15:54+0200, Alexis Lothoré wrote: > On 6/14/23 12:31, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 10:56 +0200, Alexis Lothoré via > > lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > >> From: Alexis Lothoré > >> > >> This series is a follow-up for the 4.3_M1.rc1 regression report issue. > >>

Re: [yocto] Importance of ECC RAM on the build computer

On 17/02/2023 10:41:37+0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On the other hand, I'm yet to hear an actual case of a broken build > due to non-ECC. It's not impossible, but it seems exceedingly rare. > You're far more likely to spend 100x as much time on logical errors or > out-of-resources problems.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] poky/yocto-bsps: drop 5.19 and move to 6.1

On 25/01/2023 15:04:27-0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:34 PM Alexandre Belloni > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > One of the two series breaks xen: > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/128/builds/1191/steps/13/logs/stdio > > > > That's chicken and

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] poky/yocto-bsps: drop 5.19 and move to 6.1

Hello, One of the two series breaks xen: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/128/builds/1191/steps/13/logs/stdio On 24/01/2023 17:02:05-0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > From: Bruce Ashfield > > Richard, > > These follow the OEcore patches to remove 5.19. This bumps poky >

[yocto] [meta-mingw] [PATCH] mpfr: upgrade to 4.2.x

From: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- recipes-support/mpfr/{mpfr_4.1.%.bbappend => mpfr_4.2.%.bbappend} | 0 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename recipes-support/mpfr/{mpfr_4.1.%.bbappend => mpfr_4.2.%.bbappend} (100%) diff --git

Re: [yocto] Git repo setup for Yocto upstream contribution

On 10/01/2023 15:54:55+0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 20:16, Alexandre Belloni > wrote: > > Just try to apply your patch on a bitbake repository, it will reproduce. > > I tried. This happens only if a 3-way merge is enabled: for existing > files git will strip the leading

Re: [yocto] Git repo setup for Yocto upstream contribution

On 09/01/2023 19:30:36+0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 19:23, Alexandre Belloni > wrote: > > No, please send patches against the correct git tree, else you are > > putting more load on the maintainers than necessary. > > This was the cause of: > >

Re: [yocto] Git repo setup for Yocto upstream contribution

On 09/01/2023 10:29:13+0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > I've been making patches against an integrated poky checkout for many > years, including bitbake patches. They're usually correctly picked up > and applied; you only need to ensure you route them to correct mailing > lists. > No, please

[yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] config.json: use -a option for oe-selftest

From: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- config.json | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/config.json b/config.json index 298791b694f6..000d331b8eff 100644 --- a/config.json +++ b/config.json @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder-helper][langdale][PATCH] config.json: remove meta-agl from check-layer

From: Alexandre Belloni langdale isn't currently supported on any branch of meta-agl Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- config.json | 16 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/config.json b/config.json index 27283c9f1610..45560c5cc522 100644 ---

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder-helper][PATCH] config.json: remove meta-agl from check-layer

I forgot to tag this one for langdale On 26/12/2022 10:24:19+0100, Alexandre Belloni via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > From: Alexandre Belloni > > langdale isn't currently supported on any branch of meta-agl > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > --- &

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder-helper][PATCH] config.json: remove meta-agl from check-layer

From: Alexandre Belloni langdale isn't currently supported on any branch of meta-agl Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- config.json | 16 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/config.json b/config.json index 27283c9f1610..45560c5cc522 100644 ---

[yocto] [PATCH] schedulers: Fix meta-agl branches

From: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- schedulers.py | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/schedulers.py b/schedulers.py index 803b83ccf52d..6acb7415a1c4 100644 --- a/schedulers.py +++ b/schedulers.py @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ branchdefaults = {

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [Openembedded-architecture] Y2038 proposal

On 30/11/2022 16:46:17+, Ross Burton wrote: > On 30 Nov 2022, at 14:20, Richard Purdie via lists.yoctoproject.org > wrote: > >>> * Could we optionally disable some of the glibc 32 bit function calls > >>> to ensure they're not being used? > >> > >> Could you be more specific here? Would

Re: [yocto] Y2038 proposal

On 30/11/2022 09:07:50+0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 16:45, Stephen Jolley wrote: > > We’d welcome a proposal/series on how to move forward with the Y2038 work > > for 32 bit platforms. > > I have the following proposal: > > 1. A branch is made where: > a.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] u-boot: Add /boot in SYSROOT_DIRS

Hello, This was not sent to the correct mailing list, you should send to openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org Please also set your git From:, else the mailing list is mangling your address. this should work: git config sendemail.from=sebastien.fa...@actia.fr I've taken and fixed up the

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder2][PATCH] schedulers: switch meta-ti and meta-virt to kirkstone for kirkstone builds

From: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- schedulers.py | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/schedulers.py b/schedulers.py index 6d339693ff85..22a12bdf6dd8 100644 --- a/schedulers.py +++ b/schedulers.py @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ branchdefaults = {

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] image-without-static-linkage: add class

Hello, Both patches are missing your SoB, please add those. Also, It would be great if you could add a From: as this makes it easier to get your patch from the list. This should do the trick: git config --global sendemail.from email@provider Thanks! On 04/07/2022 18:25:03+0200, Johannes

Re: [yocto] yocto support

On 28/06/2022 17:21:22+0530, Senthamilarasi mathiyan wrote: > Dear All > > Good Morning! > > In my project, I am trying to create one custom image recipe in my yocto > build system. > > The reason of creating custom image is -> having few specific > configurations for kernel and some specific

Re: [yocto] Devtool

Hello, On 12/04/2022 12:22:06+0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 04:19 -0700, Vanja Žerić wrote: > > I think that I am not allowed to publish the code, but I can try to explain > > what I have done. > > 1. There were in total 8 patches before I started to work > > 2. Run: devtool

Re: [yocto] SCM usage in source urls and bandwidth

On 30/03/2022 11:42:46+0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > [list address fixed, sorry] > > We've been having bandwidth trouble with downloads.yoctoproject.org so we did > some quick analysis to see what the issue is. Basically in speeding up the > server which was the rate limit, we hit the limits of

Re: [yocto] KERNEL_DEVICETREE cannot be appended?

Hi, On 22/03/2022 17:10:10+, Matthias Klein wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to add a device tree in a yocto based on the meta-raspberrypi > layer. > Adding the device tree via a patch in a bbapend of the kernel recipe is no > problem. > > But all attempts to add the file in the local.conf