On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Chatre, Reinette
reinette.cha...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
I am building an image using ipk packages. The minimal images all seem
to set ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND to remove_packaging_data_files, which
(for all package management systems) recursively removes the
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
belen.barros.p...@intel.com wrote:
Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
layer? I don't understand all the technical details, but I am inclined to
make it non-deletable in Hob (i.e. it is not possible to delete
maybe we should report the two bugs?
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 17:12 +0800, 倪庆亮 wrote:
yes, you are right.
the 32 bit lib and gconf is TWO problem, but maybe the reason is same,
the 'ld' search path.
the 32 bit lib is only occured on NOT pure 64 bit arch. if you are using
64 bit arch, and
Hi,
I have made a custom kernel bb file, and get some modules in
tmp/deploy/images/modules-3.3.0-r1-pangu-test.tgz,
but how to install the modules into the image?
--
Yi Qingliang
niqingli...@insigma.com.cn
https://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com
___
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Ni Qingliang
niqingli...@insigma.com.cn wrote:
maybe we should report the two bugs?
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 17:12 +0800, 倪庆亮 wrote:
yes, you are right.
the 32 bit lib and gconf is TWO problem, but maybe the reason is same,
the 'ld' search path.
the 32 bit
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 15:23 +0800, Giannis Damigos wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Ni Qingliang
niqingli...@insigma.com.cn wrote:
maybe we should report the two bugs?
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 17:12 +0800, 倪庆亮 wrote:
yes, you are right.
the 32 bit lib and gconf is TWO problem,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Rudolf Streif wrote:
1. yes, = will always override any prior ?= or ??= and any subsequent ?= or
??= will not change the
setting anymore.
2. yes, a ?= following a ??= will set the variable. Only a = will be override
the setting of the ?=.
Any following ?= and ??= will
On Thursday 29 March 2012 20:05:52 Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 29 March 2012 14:20:44 John Toomey wrote:
On 20/03/2012 16:56, Khem Raj wrote:
go into the uclibc build tree and like kernel or busybox it will have
a .config and grok that. If this is disabled then enable it in
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 16:08 -0600, Scott Rifenbark wrote:
See chapter 4 of the dev manual
(http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/dev-manual/dev-manual.html)
for this adjustment.
Looks good but can you change the title to say Excluding Recipes From
the Build :)
Cheers,
Richard
I'll do that then. Thanks!!
Belen
On 29/03/2012 16:51, Zhang, Jessica jessica.zh...@intel.com wrote:
Belen,
That should work.
Thanks,
Jessica
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org
[mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Barros Pena, Belen
Sent:
Well: I don't know. Does anybody have an answer?
Belen
On 30/03/2012 07:32, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
belen.barros.p...@intel.com wrote:
Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
layer? I don't understand
On Friday 30 March 2012 11:26:15 Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
On 30/03/2012 07:32, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
belen.barros.p...@intel.com wrote:
Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
layer? I don't
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 23:28 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Chatre, Reinette
reinette.cha...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
I am building an image using ipk packages. The minimal images all seem
to set ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND to remove_packaging_data_files, which
(for
See chapter 4 of the dev manual (
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/dev-manual/dev-manual.html) for
this adjustment.
Scott
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M
scott.m.rifenb...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Purdie
Greetings list.
I'm booting a yocto image a core-image-minimal and I've noticed that
not all of the serial ports have entries in /dev. More generally for
hardware coming down the line, I'd like to know how/where the
configuration for udev is supposed to go in a yocto BSP.
I can't see
yes
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@intel.comwrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 16:08 -0600, Scott Rifenbark wrote:
See chapter 4 of the dev manual
(http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/dev-manual/dev-manual.html)
for this adjustment.
Looks good but can you
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
* Finally, I forgot to install texinfo, and the error I got in the
command line said that I was missing makeinfo (see screenshot
attached). But when trying to install makeinfo I again got the
package could not be found error. If the error had
On 03/29/2012 11:04 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
Should we review the required packages details for the other distros to make
sure they are up to date?
It might be worthwhile to also point out that additional packages are
required to build the documentation. It might be nice to document
While beta testing yocto 1.2 I'm building for beagleboard with:
OE Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION= 1.15.1
TARGET_ARCH = arm
TARGET_OS = linux-gnueabi
MACHINE = beagleboard
DISTRO= poky
DISTRO_VERSION= 1.1+snapshot-20120330
TUNE_FEATURES
= 1.1+snapshot-20120330
TUNE_FEATURES = armv7a vfp neon cortexa8
TARGET_FPU= vfp-neon
meta
meta-yocto= unknown:unknown
I see warnings complaining that some options set by the BSP are not
valid for the kernel being built. This is the first time I noticed and
it's confusing me
On 03/30/2012 01:20 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
There are a few outstanding items for 1.2 as part of M4 .. one of
them is squashing the remaining configuration values that are
causing warnings.
I'm also seeing some kernel config errors for the MPC8315 while beta
testing. Should I ignore or
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Chatre, Reinette
reinette.cha...@intel.com wrote:
Absolutely, an option is indeed to look if recipe can do everything when
image is created. I was just surprised to learn that these minimal
images by default prevent all first boot post install scripts from
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Bob Cochran yo...@mindchasers.com wrote:
On 03/30/2012 01:20 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
There are a few outstanding items for 1.2 as part of M4 .. one of
them is squashing the remaining configuration values that are
causing warnings.
I'm also seeing some
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 10:27 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Chatre, Reinette
reinette.cha...@intel.com wrote:
Absolutely, an option is indeed to look if recipe can do everything when
image is created. I was just surprised to learn that these minimal
images by
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 05:15 heeft Bryan O'Donoghue het volgende geschreven:
Greetings list.
I'm booting a yocto image a core-image-minimal and I've noticed that not
all of the serial ports have entries in /dev. More generally for hardware
coming down the line, I'd like to know how/where
As I understand it - Poky is sort of a reference distro for the Yocto
system. I think Angstrom would be an excellent addition as an alternative,
and I'd be happy to do anything needed on the community side to help.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.netwrote:
Hi,
On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 12:26 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
RP said I should raise this on the yocto lists, so here it is:
The Angstrom core team would like to move angstrom under the yocto banner so
we
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 13:18 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 12:26 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
RP said I should raise this on the yocto lists, so here it is:
The
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:18:06PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 12:26 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
RP said I should raise this on the yocto lists, so here it is:
The Angstrom
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 13:45 heeft Tom Rini het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:18:06PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 12:26 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
RP said I
It's hard to call something Yocto Project based unless it used
something from the Yocto Project. meta-yocto being on of those
components.
So bitbake and oe-core don't count because they're external projects?
If oe-core doesn't count, that will go directly against the agreement the
I have some hope of bringing a little bit of order to the chaos that seems
to be ensuing here. I am speaking here from my own understanding, which may
or may not be correct.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.comwrote:
On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 15:18 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 12:26 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
RP said I should raise this on the yocto lists, so here it is:
The Angstrom core
My apologies for loosing the reply indent, I blame apple mail
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 14:01 heeft Osier-mixon, Jeffrey het volgende geschreven:
Angstrom does use oe-core, but I don't think it uses linux-yocto (right?) and
definitely not meta-yocto.
linux-yocto is a kernel, which is used by
I just thought I'd chime in on this discussion as someone who is outside of
both groups. It's been difficult to explain to our teams internally the whole
Yocto Project vs. Angstrom-core terminology, and since everyone here is
familiar with Linux and distros, we decided to put it in those terms.
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
The following changes since commit 06fc2d2ec8e72f063f2c67601b2f027f76971e05:
documentation/dev-manual/dev-manual-common-tasks.xml: Title change
(2012-03-30 17:20:51 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This Fixes bug: [YOCTO #2176]
This fixes the following issue as mentioned in the bug:
If nasm-native has to be rebuilt (due to a signature change) it will fail:
| checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
|
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This makes the libraries located in places like this findable:
/usr/local/oecore-x86_64/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/lib
Which avoids linking cross canadian sdk executables with host libraries like
this:
$ ldd
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This fixes bug: [YOCTO #2089]
This avoids these errors
NOTE: package eglibc-locale-2.13-r19: task do_populate_sysroot: Started
ERROR: Error executing a python function in
/opt/poky.git/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-locale_2.13.bb:
OSError: [Errno
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 2:11 PM
The criteria I see for being part of the Yocto Project are:
a) Sharing the project's objectives (e.g. making embedded Liunx
development easier)
b)
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Stewart, David C
david.c.stew...@intel.com wrote:
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 2:11 PM
The criteria I see for being part of the Yocto Project are:
a) Sharing
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 04:09:37PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Stewart, David C
david.c.stew...@intel.com wrote:
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 2:11 PM
On 03/30/2012 03:52 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This fixes bug: [YOCTO #2089]
This avoids these errors
NOTE: package eglibc-locale-2.13-r19: task do_populate_sysroot: Started
ERROR: Error executing a python function in
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:06:04PM +, Stewart, David C wrote:
Finally, Dr. Kooi has stated that he doesn't see YP as an upstream. In fact,
many
of the OSVs (like Wind River, Mentor Graphics and now ENEA - yeah!) absolutely
want to use YP as their upstream. So I'm hoping we could change
On 03/30/2012 02:11 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 15:18 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 12:26 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
RP said I should raise this on the yocto
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 16:49 heeft Tom Rini het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:06:04PM +, Stewart, David C wrote:
Finally, Dr. Kooi has stated that he doesn't see YP as an upstream. In fact,
many
of the OSVs (like Wind River, Mentor Graphics and now ENEA - yeah!)
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 16:52 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
[snip]
On 03/30/2012 02:11 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
The criteria I see for being part of the Yocto Project are:
a) Sharing the project's objectives (e.g. making embedded Liunx
development easier)
b) Willing to be
On 03/30/2012 05:08 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 16:52 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
[snip]
On 03/30/2012 02:11 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
The criteria I see for being part of the Yocto Project are:
a) Sharing the project's objectives (e.g. making embedded
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 17:28 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
On 03/30/2012 05:08 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 16:52 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
[snip]
On 03/30/2012 02:11 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
The criteria I see for being part of the Yocto
On 03/30/2012 05:53 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 17:28 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
On 03/30/2012 05:08 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 16:52 heeft Darren Hart het volgende
geschreven:
[snip]
On 03/30/2012 02:11 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 18:21 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
So that brings us back to what does it mean for Angstrom to be a Yocto
Project project I guess?
In my very humble opinion (really), it still makes sense to build
Angstrom with the components in the poky repository as
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 21:18 +0800, Autif Khan wrote:
Hi,
I have made a custom kernel bb file, and get some modules in
tmp/deploy/images/modules-3.3.0-r1-pangu-test.tgz,
but how to install the modules into the image?
There is a chance that I completely misunderstand your scenario.
Hi,
I'm working on the bb file for opensaf, and it need the shutil module of
python, but it is not installed with the python.
the shutil module is included in the python package on archlinux, and I
don't know other distribution.
my question: how to modify the python bb file to install the
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 03/30/2012 06:37 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 18:21 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
So that brings us back to what does it mean for Angstrom to be a Yocto
Project project I guess?
In my
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset adds a new section for the Yocto BSP Tools, and removes a note
that this patchset makes obsolete in the process.
The following changes since commit 2ec1368c4bdf5d61e3a7d60d3293ba878939321d:
Scott Rifenbark (1):
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
Some documentation introducing and helping get people started with the
Yocto BSP Tools (yocto-bsp and yocto-kernel).
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
---
documentation/bsp-guide/bsp.xml | 450 +++
1
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
Remove the 'note' that says that the BSP Guide doesn't show how to
create a new BSP. With the addition of the Yocto BSP Tools section,
that's no longer true.
Also, the wiki page mentioned is out-of-date and probably shouldn't be
pointed to any longer for
On 03/30/2012 08:00 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 03/30/2012 06:37 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 18:21 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
So that brings us back to what does it mean for Angstrom to
58 matches
Mail list logo
