[yocto] [PATCH] meta-yocto-bsp: Disable the glamor acceleration for the beaglebone

2019-02-28 Thread Kevin Hao
In the commit ec6d61cbddc3 ("mesa: enable native and nativesdk variants"), the gallium is enabled for the mesa. Since we use the modesetting driver for the Xorg on the beagleboard and the glamor acceleration method is enabled by the modesetting driver, the gallium DRI driver will be used after

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][RFC 0/3] qemuarm|qemuarm64: graphics support

2019-02-28 Thread Jon Mason
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:09 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:58 PM Jon Mason wrote: > > > > This series reverts the reversion of qemuarm match for qemuarma15, and > > adds graphics support for both qemuarm and qemuarm64. > > > > I'm sending this out as an RFC as there are

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][RFC 0/3] qemuarm|qemuarm64: graphics support

2019-02-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:58 PM Jon Mason wrote: > > This series reverts the reversion of qemuarm match for qemuarma15, and > adds graphics support for both qemuarm and qemuarm64. > > I'm sending this out as an RFC as there are some issues with the > implementation, and this should probably only

[yocto] Proper way to set locale and keymap

2019-02-28 Thread Jean-Christian de Rivaz
Hi all, After some experiments on Poky thud I have found this method to set my fr_CH.utf8 local and fr_CH-latin keymap in my distribution with systemd and without busybox: Add this two lines to the local configuration or distribution configuration file: GLIBC_GENERATE_LOCALES = "fr_CH.UTF-8"

Re: [yocto] ROS support on yocto project

2019-02-28 Thread Stephen Lawrence
Hi, >It does work. BTW, afaik there is no yocto 3.9.0, 2.6.1 is last stable if I am >not mistaken. I think Oscar is referring to the BSP version. 3.9.0 was a recent release. Regards Steve From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org On Behalf Of Matthias Schoepfer Sent: 28 February 2019

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

2019-02-28 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 05:42:03PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: > > You can also blacklist busybox to ensure that it never builds, and thus > > can't > > show up in your target image. > > > > PNBLACKLIST[busybox] = "Don't build this" > > Sounds

Re: [yocto] ROS support on yocto project

2019-02-28 Thread Stephen Lawrence
Hi Carlos, When you say ROS do you mean the Robotic OS? BMW Car IT have a yocto layer, with MIT license, for cross compiling it here: https://github.com/bmwcarit/meta-ros I'm not familiar with it but it seems to be actively maintained and as you are using an R-Car M3 board I assume your

[yocto] Cannot use LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE = "1" with mDNS package

2019-02-28 Thread Stefano Cappa
I'm using the latest version from git branch of yocto thud. If I add to INSTALL the package "mdns" and also I want to create all files for licenses adding LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE = "1" the build of the final image fails with this error: Error myimage-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Postinstall scriptlets of

Re: [yocto] ROS support on yocto project

2019-02-28 Thread Scott Rifenbark
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:26 AM Matthias Schoepfer < matthias.schoep...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > > Yes, there is, there is a meta-ros. > > > For your convenience: > > > > https://discourse.ros.org/t/new-version-of-meta-ros-for-kinetic-distribution/2833 > >

Re: [yocto] ROS support on yocto project

2019-02-28 Thread Matthias Schoepfer
Hi! Yes, there is, there is a meta-ros. For your convenience: https://discourse.ros.org/t/new-version-of-meta-ros-for-kinetic-distribution/2833 https://github.com/bmwcarit/meta-ros It does work. BTW, afaik there is no yocto 3.9.0, 2.6.1 is last stable if I am not mistaken. Regards,

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH V2] xmlsec1: add PACKAGECONFIG disable-des

2019-02-28 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 01:46:25PM +0800, changqing...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Changqing Li > > Signed-off-by: Changqing Li Reviewed-by: Tom Rini -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ yocto mailing list

[yocto] Enabling BLE on RPI 3B+ using meta-rasperrypi recipe

2019-02-28 Thread Utsav Jain
Hi, I am using meta-raspberrypi https://github.com/agherzan/meta-raspberrypi recipe to build an image for RPI 3B+ . I want to enable bluetooth on the device. My local.conf looks something like this CONF_VERSION = "1" ENABLE_UART = "1" ENABLE_RPI3_SERIAL_CONSOLE = "1" SERIAL_CONSOLES =

Re: [yocto] Error in do_rootfs while builing on sumo with cmake the library called "libfmt" 4.1.0 (on rocko it was ok)

2019-02-28 Thread Joanna
I had a similar problem where the rapidjson recipe was not working only on sumo. The problem was that the default ${PN} package was empty so it would not be generated, but do_rootfs would try to include it. It helped to add a bbappend with the following line: FILES_${PN} = " ${includedir}/ " in

[yocto] ROS support on yocto project

2019-02-28 Thread Carlos Pozos Ochoa
I recently acquire a Renesas R Car M3 board which runs on an embedded linux image build by means of the Yocto project. We are currently using YOCTO 3.9.0. We are looking forward to implement ROS kinetic libraries on this embedded linux. Does the yocto project supports this libraries? In the

[yocto] ROS support on yocto project

2019-02-28 Thread Carlos Pozos Ochoa
Hi, I recently acquire a Renesas R Car M3 board which runs on an embedded linux image build by means of the Yocto project. We are currently using YOCTO 3.9.0. We are looking forward to implement ROS kinetic libraries on this embedded linux. Does the yocto project supports this libraries? In

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

2019-02-28 Thread Jean-Christian de Rivaz
Le 28.02.19 à 06:19, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:59:42PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: >> ... >> Also swap vim for something in core obviously. > It is not obvious how to do that. > > What other vi implementation is in core? > Is there even any good non-busybox non-GUI editor

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

2019-02-28 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 09:37 -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 02:27:37PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 12:05 +, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > I thought we had some other editor in core, but can't see > > > one. Worse > > > case we still use busybox for its

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

2019-02-28 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 02:27:37PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 12:05 +, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 05:20, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > That's a good start. For a oe-core packagegroup > > > > > > I do not think a core-only packagegroup makes sense

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

2019-02-28 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 12:05 +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 05:20, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > That's a good start. For a oe-core packagegroup > > > > I do not think a core-only packagegroup makes sense when the goal > > is to > > completely replace busybox (and not just most

[yocto] [PATCH meta-selinux] Backport patches from upstream to fix build with musl

2019-02-28 Thread luca . boccassi
From: Luca Boccassi Audit 2.8.4 fails to build with musl. The fixes have been committed to the upstream master branch and can be backported. Building with glibc is unaffected. Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi --- ...dupa-as-suggested-in-pull-request-25.patch | 47 ++

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/3] features: Add the drm-bochs feature

2019-02-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:44 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 6:20 AM Bruce Ashfield > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:18 AM Bruce Ashfield > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Allistair, > > > > > > Which kernel versions were you using for these ? I was thinking 4.19 > >

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

2019-02-28 Thread Burton, Ross
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 05:20, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > That's a good start. For a oe-core packagegroup > > I do not think a core-only packagegroup makes sense when the goal is to > completely replace busybox (and not just most apps while keeping a few > busybox apps installed). But a "close