Re: [yocto] [PATCH 3/3] recipes-bsp/u-boot: update to the latest version

-rockchip/, they left my and Romain's names as maintainers in the README (along with instructions for github) On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:19 PM ayaka wrote: > > On 5/6/19 9:31 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > On Sat 2019-05-04 @ 06:43:34 PM, ayaka wrote: > >> On 5/4/19 11:06 AM,

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 3/3] recipes-bsp/u-boot: update to the latest version

On Sat 2019-05-04 @ 06:43:34 PM, ayaka wrote: > > On 5/4/19 11:06 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > On Wed 2019-04-24 @ 10:59:18 PM, Randy 'ayaka' Li wrote: > > > From: Randy Li > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Randy Li > > > --- > &

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 3/3] recipes-bsp/u-boot: update to the latest version

On Wed 2019-04-24 @ 10:59:18 PM, Randy 'ayaka' Li wrote: > From: Randy Li > > Signed-off-by: Randy Li > --- > recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-rockchip_git.bb | 18 ++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-rockchip_git.bb > > diff --git

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/3] recipes-bsp/u-boot: fixup build for gcc7

On Wed 2019-04-24 @ 10:59:16 PM, Randy 'ayaka' Li wrote: > Signed-off-by: Randy Li > Signed-off-by: Randy 'ayaka' Li > --- > .../u-boot/u-boot-rockchip/gcc7_fixup.patch | 38 +++ Why do we care about gcc7 on master? Master only has support for gcc8. --

Re: [yocto] [PATCH v2 01/10] conf/machine: add support for rk3399

On Tue 2019-04-23 @ 09:25:05 PM, Randy 'ayaka' Li wrote: > RK3399 is a new generation powerful SoC from Rockchip, which has > Dual Cortex-A72 + Quad Cortex-A53, 64-bit CPU. > > Signed-off-by: Randy 'ayaka' Li > --- > conf/machine/excavator-rk3399.conf | 12 >

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/5] conf/machine: rk3288: Add some machine files

On Sun 2019-04-21 @ 11:53:35 PM, Randy 'ayaka' Li wrote: > Evb-rk3288 is the offical evaluate board. > Fennec-rk3288 and Tinker-rk3288 is rk3288 based SBCs. > Tinker Boards is a RPi compatible board made by ASUS. I would rather these were separated out as individual commits. meta-rockchip already

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 3/5] conf/machine: add support for rk3328

On Sun 2019-04-21 @ 11:53:37 PM, Randy 'ayaka' Li wrote: > The RK3328 is a SoC with Quad-core Cortex-A53 for Smart OTT/IPTV. > > Signed-off-by: Randy 'ayaka' Li > --- > conf/machine/evb-rk3328.conf| 12 > conf/machine/include/rk3328.inc | 18 ++ > 2 files

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 4/5] conf/machine: add support for rk3036

On Sun 2019-04-21 @ 11:53:38 PM, Randy 'ayaka' Li wrote: > RK3036 is a SoC from Rockchip which has Dual-Core > ARM Cortex-A7 CPU, for low-end OTT TV Box. > > Supporting video acceleration for the HEVC and AVC > up to 1080P video. With a HDMI sink. > > Signed-off-by: Randy 'ayaka' Li >

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 5/5] conf/machine: add support for rv1108

On Sun 2019-04-21 @ 11:53:39 PM, Randy 'ayaka' Li wrote: > RV1108 is a SoC specific for video enhanced and > recording. It is embedded with a DSP for digital > process and an ARM Cortex-A7 single core processor > for system and application. > > Signed-off-by: Randy 'ayaka' Li > --- >

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/5] conf/machine: add rk3399 support

On Sun 2019-04-21 @ 11:53:36 PM, Randy 'ayaka' Li wrote: > RK3399 is a new generation powerful SoC from Rockchip, which has > Dual Cortex-A72 + Quad Cortex-A53, 64-bit CPU. > > Signed-off-by: Randy 'ayaka' Li > --- > conf/machine/excavator-rk3399.conf | 10 ++ >

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH 0/5] add new SoCs support

Hi Randy, On Sun 2019-04-21 @ 11:53:34 PM, Randy 'ayaka' Li wrote: > After the FOSDEM, my patches for ARMv8 cortex tuning > are finally merged. So I think it is complete the > lose piece at meta-rockchip. > > Since the big-litte is not supported by OE now, > I make all the chips' configure to

Re: [yocto] qemu segmentation fault on gobject-introspection

On Wed 2019-02-20 @ 11:50:45 PM, João Gonçalves wrote: > Hello, > when trying to migrate my build to master branch of oe layers I got this > qemu segmentation fault during gobject-introspection. > Does anyone have any clue on this? > > Thank you, > João Gonçalves > > | qemu: uncaught target

[yocto] OE Summit report from SCaLE17x

Hi, Earlier this week I got back from SCaLE17x during which I taught an E-ALE class on Buildroot, was a TA for the other E-ALE classes, organized and ran the first ever (hopefully of more to come) OE Summit, and gave a general intro talk on OE. I wasn't planning on giving an OE talk at SCaLE, but

Re: [yocto] OE Summit report from SCaLE17x

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:27 AM Trevor Woerner wrote: > I'd like to thank the OE Board of Directors who > gave me permission to create and run a mini-conference on their behalf. > ... and provided funding!! (without which this event would never have been able to happen) So thanks to

Re: [yocto] [oe] OE Summit @ SCaLE 17x - Sunday March 10th 2019 - Pasadena CA

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 5:40 AM Andrea Galbusera wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:26 AM Trevor Woerner wrote: > > The schedule for the OE Summit has been posted: > > https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/scale/17x/schedule/sunday > > https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/scale/17x/o

[yocto] OE Summit @ SCaLE 17x - Sunday March 10th 2019 - Pasadena CA

ople, please join us in Pasadena on March 10th! Your OE Summit organizing committee: Tom King Behan Webster Trevor Woerner -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] Dropping armv5 and armv5e tunes in 2.7

Hello Khem, Thanks for pointing this out. On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 5:02 PM Khem Raj wrote: > Secondly, I would also like to drop armv4t, and keep armv5te as lowest > supported tune > Fortunately I don't have any ARMv4 boards. But, just for informational purposes, I wanted to point out that I

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] OEDAM @ SCaLE 2019

Hi Jon, On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:56 PM Jon Mason wrote: > I am planning on being at SCaLE (assuming the OEDEM happens there). > > Many corporate travel budgets are tied to presenting at conferences. > So, if we could somehow get a track there (which might be too late in > the game to do now),

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] OEDAM @ SCaLE 2019

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:32 PM akuster808 wrote: > Trevor, > > > On 11/1/18 7:04 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > Please see time indices: 12:13 and 16:45 > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YDAHjIOXCIgvSZVOKCYLxa8h26dkruX8zspoge7zCpk > > Could you please giv

[yocto] OEDAM @ SCaLE 2019

Hello Fellow YP/OE Enthusiasts! There were discussions at our recent OEDEM regarding: - our next developers meeting - SCaLE 2019 - expanding/adding to the YP/OE presence at conferences (i.e. our own miniconf?) Please see time indices: 12:13 and 16:45

Re: [linux-yocto] Using a pre-build kernel

Maybe bin_package.bbclass can help? http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/classes/bin_package.bbclass -- ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] conf: machine: Add support for vyasa-rk3288

Hello Shyam, Thank you for your contribution! I just have 3 small nits with your patch, which I am happy to fix myself without you needing to send a v2 (if that's okay with you): 1. I see that there's a mistake in meta-rockchip's README file which I will fix, the email subject should be

Re: [yocto] TPM2-TSS-1.1.0.bb does not use local files when BB_NO_NETWORK = "1"

which layer? meta-secure-core includes a fix for this, but in master https://github.com/jiazhang0/meta-secure-core/pull/63 there's also: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Technical_FAQ#How_do_I_do_an_offline_build_with_recipes_that_have_SRCREV_.3D_.22.24.7BAUTOREV.7D.22_set.3F On Tue, Aug 14,

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] - X11 EGLSV2 Chromium

Hi Karim, Can you please also include the "Build Configuration" block that's printed at the start of the build? That way we know what layers you're using, and which branches/commits of those layers. Best regards, Trevor -- ___ yocto mailing list

[yocto] yocto dev day 2018 eurpoe

Has a date/location been set? (Is it too presumptuous of me to assume there will be a Yocto Dev Day in Scotland this year?) -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Waveshare touchscreen

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 4:40 AM, Michele Tirinzoni wrote: > Anyway, the config.txt is just enough to be able to use the screen with > touch functionality ? No need to have any driver installed ? > These panels have two cables that must be connected to the board: HDMI and USB. The HDMI handles

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Waveshare touchscreen

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Michele Tirinzoni wrote: > > I saw in the documentation page that the Waveshare touchscreen is > supported. > Before buying one of those I'd like to know if anyone tried it recently > with a rpi zero w or if there's any known issue. > I added the support for the

Re: [yocto] Issue when integrating different bsp-layers on a single bblayers.conf

Hi Iván, On Thu 2018-06-07 @ 04:39:11 PM, Iván Castell wrote: > When setting the "build" directory with a bblayers.conf customized for a > single platform, each platform builds the image recipe properly. > > However, when I have integrated all bsp-layers in a single bblayers.conf, > the

Re: [yocto] [Call to Action] Yocto Project Bug Triage

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey < jeffrey.osier-mi...@intel.com> wrote: > Here are links for shared google calendars for > > > > Public meetings: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/b/2?cid= > dGhleW9jdG9wcm9qZWN0QGdtYWlsLmNvbQ > > > > Release schedule:

Re: [yocto] [Call to Action] Yocto Project Bug Triage

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Michael Halstead < mhalst...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > The meeting page is https://www.yoctoproject.org/public-virtual-meetings/ > for anyone interested. > Would it be possible to get event planners interested in

[yocto] interacting with patchwork / unmerged development work

Hello, One of the minor inconveniences with submitting patches to this project, is to work on a patch against master (for example), submit it, then find that yesterday someone submitted a patch against the same file you're editing causing your patch to not apply with what the maintainer is going

Re: [yocto] [Call to Action] Yocto Project Bug Triage

Is someone working on putting together a (google?) calendar of the various project (OE Yocto) meetings? -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Minites: Yocto Project Bug Triage

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Jolley, Stephen K < stephen.k.jol...@intel.com> wrote: > AR: Stephen – Mention IRC channel and links on IRC and meeting invite. > Also: create calendar of Yocto meetings (google calendar?) -- ___ yocto mailing list

Re: [yocto] Canceled: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting

Did the updated invite go out? I don't think I've seen it. Is the meeting scheduled for May 15th? On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Cetola, Stephano wrote: > Stephen will be sending an updated Technical Meeting invite shortly. > > > Cheers, > Stephano > > -- >

Re: [yocto] Help with Bitbake: (bitbake-layers show-recipes)

*$ git clone git://git.linaro.org/openembedded/jenkins-setup.git * Since the repository from which you're working comes from Linaro, maybe you'll have better luck getting support from their mailing list?

Re: [yocto] Recipe availability through eSDK (cppzmq)

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > 1) If you want the cppzmq development files to be available *within* the > eSDK > (so you can write code to use them using the eSDK), even if they are not > brought in by way of the image containing a package

Re: [yocto] typo in tzdata_2018c.bb

Hi Kévin, On Wed 2018-04-25 @ 10:46:28 AM, Kévin Carli wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to signal a typo in the > meta/recipes-extended/tzdata/tzdata/tzdata_2018c.bb > (https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-extended/ > tzdata/tzdata_2018c.bb?h=morty) file. > > At this

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 05/25] FogBugz #532583-1: hwmon: Update A10SR HWMON register calls

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Bruce Ashfield < bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote: > On 04/04/2018 07:48 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > >> What's a FogBugz? >> > > The bug tracker for the upstream repo that was used for the > patches. While not useful for us (a

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 05/25] FogBugz #532583-1: hwmon: Update A10SR HWMON register calls

What's a FogBugz? On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:37 PM, wrote: > From: Thor Thayer > > commit c3d8a24d4cae45f0240e82f007de2286bb4e8071 from > https://github.com/altera-opensource/linux-socfpga.git > > The A10 System Resource HWMON needs to be

Re: [yocto] [Mesa-dev] VC4 not working for me with mesa 17.3.7 - was [meta-raspberrypi] VC4 not working for me with mesa 17.3.7

On Mon 2018-04-02 @ 11:46:39 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm re-building my rpi3-64 image to see if things are better there too under > > vc4. > You'll let me know I guess... Everything's worki

Re: [yocto] [Mesa-dev] VC4 not working for me with mesa 17.3.7 - was [meta-raspberrypi] VC4 not working for me with mesa 17.3.7

On Mon 2018-04-02 @ 11:46:39 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: > > to my conf/local.conf has glmark2-es2 running, and chromium-x11 is running > > accelerated out-of-the-box (i.e. I don't have to install the egl/gles > > libraries it builds itself). > Cool - have not seen it running without issues for very

Re: [yocto] [Mesa-dev] VC4 not working for me with mesa 17.3.7 - was [meta-raspberrypi] VC4 not working for me with mesa 17.3.7

Even without the patch, simply adding: PACKAGECONFIG_append_pn-mesa = "dri3" to my conf/local.conf has glmark2-es2 running, and chromium-x11 is running accelerated out-of-the-box (i.e. I don't have to install the egl/gles libraries it builds itself). I'm re-building my rpi3-64 image to

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Has anybody run VC4 + X + recent meta/masters lately

On Thu 2018-03-29 @ 11:34:08 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:23 PM, Andreas Müller > <schnitzelt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've seen the 'Modifier 0x0 vs. ti

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Has anybody run VC4 + X + recent meta/masters lately

I've seen the 'Modifier 0x0 vs. tiling(0x7001) mismatch' error and blank screen hundreds of times while working on getting chromium-x11 accelerated. It would happen if chromium was trying to use the system gl/gles libraries instead of the ones it builds. --

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Has anybody run VC4 + X + recent meta/masters lately

64bit RPi or 32? -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Documentation error report

Hi Daryl, On Sat 2018-03-10 @ 07:10:02 PM, da...@daryllee.com wrote: > I'm not sure who to send this to, so maybe someone can redirect me... Scott Rifenbark is responsible for all YP documentation: srifenbark AT gmail DOT com Ideally, if you're comfortable with git, you could generate a patch

Re: [yocto] Here is my BSP for the adzs-sc589-ezlite eval board.

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Peter Spierenburg < peter.spierenb...@nautel.com> wrote: > I've created a board support package for the adzs-sc589-ezlite evaluation > board from Analog Devices. > Would you consider adding it to the layer index? http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/submit/

Re: [yocto] Yocto uses UTC time for DATETIME instead of localtime

On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Davis Roman wrote: > I'm using the DATETIME variable to generate timestamps for my final images > however I see that yocto is using UTC time. > > I'd much prefer if yocto used localtime. > > Any suggestions on how to change this? > > You

Re: [yocto] Eclipse plugin plans

Just to clarify... will non-IDE non-Linux development be explicitly supported? -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] linux kernel rt

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:43 AM, Martin Hundebøll < martin.hundeb...@prevas.dk> wrote: > > > On 2018-01-26 04:51, Khem Raj wrote: > >> >> Secondly, I wonder how good is upstream mainline kernel for rpi now a >> days, we could always have a mainline recipe as an option and use it as >> base for

Re: [yocto] Error do_compile libepoxy

On Mon 2018-01-22 @ 10:12:27 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: > I'll try to follow up with a patch to meta-raspberrypi and > possibly upstream to userland. In the end, I don't think libepoxy is > the right place to explicitly put the change. What's your opinion > here? If I write C code, and in one of

Re: [yocto] Error do_compile libepoxy

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Michael Gloff wrote: > I can confirm adding #include to test/egl_common.c gets past > the original error, but then fails with: > > thank you for checking :-) > > > Log data follows: > | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile > | [1/2]

Re: [yocto] Error do_compile libepoxy

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 4:05 AM, Alexander Kanavin < alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 01/18/2018 10:58 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: > >> >> Looks like my first guess was not that bad. Reverting below commit, >> which switched to meson build system brought my build back to green. >>

Re: [yocto] [poky] Fwd: How to make the os-release package work with local walltime instead of GMT?

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:26 AM, Robert Yang wrote: > BUILD_ID = "${@time.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S',time.localtime())}" > Brilliant! Why isn't this the default? -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] add kernel modules & dtbo's for Raspberry Pi3

On Wed 2017-12-20 @ 11:40:50 PM, Greg Wilson-Lindberg wrote: > I'm building an image for the Raspberry Pi 3 and I'm trying to add some > modules to the kernel and I need to add some device tree overlays. The > modules and overlays are part of the kernel, just not built by default. > > For the

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] The various rockchip layers

On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Mirza Krak wrote: > As I started digging to check the current state of the different > layers it was quite clear to me that there where two different sets. > One is maintained by Rockchip [1] and the other one by the community > [2]. Don't

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] Revert "qtbase: Enable EGLFS support"

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> This is very useful, can this concept be upstreamed to OE-Core? > > I think so; if people agree with this concept I can work in upstreaming it. > > There is also the machine-overrides-extender.bbclass[1]

[yocto] bitbake memres usecase

Hi, I'm trying to understand if memres is right for me. Every night my machine, via jenkins, grinds away doing about a dozen builds. Each of these builds is for a separate MACHINE, in separate directories, with separate layers, configurations, etc. My jenkins instance has two executors (on the

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: update require path

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote: > I have a small layer I use for booting mainline components on the tinker, so > i can confirm that works with current upstream. > > https://github.com/jackmitch/meta-tinker Thanks! :-D --

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: update require path

Hey Tom, On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 06:40:32PM -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: > >> The oe-core recipe was updated (2017.05 -> 2017.07), this recipe needed to >> be updated to suit. However, this u-bo

[yocto] [PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: update require path

The oe-core recipe was updated (2017.05 -> 2017.07), this recipe needed to be updated to suit. However, this u-boot (from rockchip) is still at version 2017.05. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> --- recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-rockchip_git.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

[yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] linux: 4.11 -> 4.12

Bump mainline kernel to latest release. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> --- recipes-kernel/linux/{linux_4.11.bb => linux_4.12.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename recipes-kernel/linux/{linux_4.11.bb => linux_4.12.bb} (88%) diff --g

[yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] rockchip-gpt-img: fix deprecated notation

The older "IMAGE_DEPENDS..." notation has been deprecated in favour of the newer "do_image_...[depends]" notation. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> --- classes/rockchip-gpt-img.bbclass | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) dif

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting

In other words it's being pushed back a week for the US holiday? -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [meta-chip][PATCH V2 0/3] Initial attempt at flashing instructions.

rnative. It does function though. Looks and works great! Thanks for investigating and getting this working :-) Tested-by: Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [meta-chip] Jenkins, reviews and mailing list

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > We've been testing a setup with meta-raspberrypi which seems to work fine: > PR to github integrated with a jenkins server and use mailing list for > discussions. > > I propose to copy the same setup to meta-chip too.

Re: [yocto] Current state of linux-raspberrypi-rt?

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Paul D. DeRocco <pdero...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Google turns up a lot of stuff about this, but the latest I found was a > thread from 1/5/17 that started with Trevor Woerner posting a 1MB patch, > and that ended with him posting a message saying

Re: [yocto] using clang for one recipe

On Fri 2017-06-23 @ 03:57:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Adding that line, and adding meta-clang to bblayers.conf, did get the > > llvm/clang compiler built and installed to recipe-sysroot-nativ

[yocto] using clang for one recipe

I want to have one recipe build with clang instead of gcc (gcc is being used for the rest of the image). I thought this was as simple as adding the following line to the recipe: TOOLCHAIN = "clang" Adding that line, and adding meta-clang to bblayers.conf, did get the llvm/clang compiler

Re: [yocto] [meta-chip][RFC PATCH 3/3] chip: Add chip-u-boot-scr recipe and flash script

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Drew Moseley <drew.mose...@mender.io> wrote: > >> On Jun 19, 2017, at 1:48 AM, Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> If you have a serial console connected to >>> +your board, you will see the progress an

Re: [yocto] [meta-chip][RFC PATCH 3/3] chip: Add chip-u-boot-scr recipe and flash script

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri 2017-06-16 @ 05:15:40 PM, drew.mose...@mender.io wrote: > Any thoughts? It appears my image was too large. Using a smaller image appears to work

Re: [yocto] [meta-chip][RFC PATCH 3/3] chip: Add chip-u-boot-scr recipe and flash script

On Fri 2017-06-16 @ 05:15:40 PM, drew.mose...@mender.io wrote: > +This script will take some time to execute. true > If you have a serial console connected to > +your board, you will see the progress and a message on the console will > indicate when > +the flashing is completed. hmmm, never

Re: [yocto] [meta-chip][RFC PATCH 3/3] chip: Add chip-u-boot-scr recipe and flash script

On Fri 2017-06-16 @ 05:15:40 PM, drew.mose...@mender.io wrote: > diff --git a/README b/README > index cccf59e..cf52e05 100644 > --- a/README > +++ b/README > @@ -59,4 +59,28 @@ To build a machine supported by this BSP layer follow the > next steps: Please wrap the additions to the README to 80

Re: [yocto] [meta-chip][RFC PATCH 2/3] chip: Build sunxi-tools-native.

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 5:15 PM, wrote: > Add LAYERDEPENDS on meta-sunxi and add the sunxi-tools-native > pacakage to EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS. meta-chip's README should also indicate this dependency. -- ___ yocto mailing list

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 2/2] u-boot: Backport upstream fix for gmac_rockchip

Hi Romain, I assume this patch is meant to fix an ethernet issue in u-boot? How does someone test that ethernet is working from u-boot? Here is my firefly booting with these patches: U-Boot SPL 2017.05 (Jun 17 2017 - 17:12:20) Returning to boot ROM... U-Boot 2017.05

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: Switch to u-boot-common_2017.05.inc

Hi Romain, My nightly builds alerted me to the problem, so I fixed it and already pushed a patch. Thanks! Best regards, Trevor -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [meta-freescale] etnaviv image

Hey Steve, That's great to hear, and thanks for the followup :-) Otavio has since pushed everything to master, so hopefully the kludges aren't required anymore. Best regards, Trevor -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] [meta-freescale] etnaviv image

Hey Stephen, On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Stephen Arnold wrote: > @Trevor what's your config/setup? Did you wind up using the > "use-mainline-bsp" thing? Yes. As I mentioned, I was working with a wandboard, on master, therefore my layers are: -

Re: [yocto] etnaviv image

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: > Would you mind sharing your configuration (conf/local.conf, > conf/bblayers.conf)? > I'm mostly interested in trying this on my RaspberryPi3. Absolutely! I'm hoping to do a couple blog posts about it soon-ish showing

Re: [yocto] etnaviv image

w00t!! It took a lot of hacking, but I was able to build and run an image for the wandboard dual that uses etnaviv :-D Patches to follow. I now have 4 dev boards using open-source graphics: 1) rpi3-32 with vc4 2) dragonboard-410c with freedreno 3) minnow (turbot) with Intel's stuff 4) wandboard

Re: [yocto] webkitgtk2 progress bar

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > My "bitbake world" builds have few components like this, webkitgtk (used to > have webkit1, webkit2 and webkit2-efl as separate builds), 2 chromiums (x11 > and wayland), cef (luckily broken and whitelisted for a

Re: [yocto] Can Yocto treat layers like an external package?

Hi Yannick, This is a feature many people have been wanting for a while, but getting there has been slow. So slow, in fact, that many projects have simply gone ahead and implemented their own solutions, all of which are different from each other, making it all that much harder to get everyone

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 0/3] u-boot: mainline

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > I'd check with Marex the u-boot maintainer also. He may have something > queued up. It is entirely possible he isn't on this list. Good point. Marek just posted a 2017.05 update to oecore :-) --

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 0/3] u-boot: mainline

Hi Romain, On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Romain Perier <romain.per...@collabora.com> wrote: > Le 24/05/2017 à 16:55, Trevor Woerner a écrit : >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Romain Perier >> <romain.per...@collabora.com> wrote: >>> Le 22/05/2017 à 18

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 0/3] u-boot: mainline

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Romain Perier <romain.per...@collabora.com> wrote: > Le 22/05/2017 à 18:08, Trevor Woerner a écrit : >> u-boot 2017.05 was released May 10. Wouldn't it be better to update >> oe-core's u-boot to 2017.05 then just add any differences in >&

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 0/3] u-boot: mainline

u-boot 2017.05 was released May 10. Wouldn't it be better to update oe-core's u-boot to 2017.05 then just add any differences in meta-rockchip? On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Romain Perier wrote: > This set of patches add a new u-boot-common file for 2017.05, so >

Re: [yocto] [PATCH v3 1/3] recipes-multimedia: add Rockchip MPP library

Randy, Neither of the issues that were identified in your v2 of this patch were addressed in this v3. Namely: 1) please use your real name (first, last) in your signed-off-by line 2) please don't create a package from this recipe whose name doesn't include the recipe name (i.e. please don't

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] [PATCH v2 3/3] recipes-multimedia: images: rockchip media image

On Sat 2017-05-13 @ 06:20:35 PM, Romain Perier wrote: > Clearly a NAK here. I don't want yet another image for this, that's a > bsp meta layer, it is supposed to contain the recipes and rules to > propose support for Rockchip SocS in in yocto/oe and its reference > distros. But it is also supposed

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] linux: version bump to 4.11

Thanks! Tested on the firefly-rk3288 and applied. On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Romain Perier wrote: > Linux v4.11 has been released, bump the version to 4.11. > > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier > --- >

Re: [yocto] [yocto-announce] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yocto Project 2.3 (pyro 17.0.0) Released

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Tracy Graydon wrote: > The latest release of the Yocto Project 2.3 (pyro-17.0.0) is now available > for download at: w00t!! Congrats everyone! :-) -- ___ yocto mailing list

Re: [yocto] Raspberry pi build with QT5 creator...... failing to compile.

Hi Steve, It seems like there's a lot of stuff going on at the same time. So to start I'd like to just focus on one thing at a time. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Steve Plant wrote: > I'm currently attempting to build a raspberry pi image, which I can use to > develop QT5

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Pull requests and jenkins

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Paul Barker wrote: >> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I know I promised long ago but finally I took a

Re: [yocto] dhcp eth0 network

nt to get configured as dhcp (no > static)... > > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Trevor Woerner" <twoer...@gmail.com> > To: "Peter Balazovic" <balazovic.pe...@gmail.com> > Cc: "Yocto list discussion" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>

Re: [yocto] dhcp eth0 network

Hi Peter, For what MACHINE are you building? What's your target hardware? Can you summarize the steps you took to build your image? What do you want eth0 to do? dhcp or static ip? Best regards, Trevor On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Peter Balazovic wrote: >

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Stable branch plans

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Paul Barker wrote: > On 3 May 2017 2:41 a.m., "Khem Raj" wrote: > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Paul Barker wrote: >> >> I'd like to propose the following for the pyro branch: >> >> * We should

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Stable branch plans

It is very likely that I too will be trying to base an rpi-based "product" off of pyro and hope that it will be as pain-free as possible :-) I don't have any past experience with this, so I can't speak to any past issues. -- ___ yocto mailing list

[yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] README: remove irrelevant information

As of openembedded-core commit 2b3ae58f5eaecc8474761c543ff5347aa0e3c4c8 hardfp is enabled by default. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> --- README | 16 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index b2e89f3..7f4a499 100644 --- a/

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] linux: version bump to 4.11-rc8

Applied, thanks! It's nice to finally see those "mmc_host mmc2: Bus speed (slot 0) = 5000Hz (slot req 5200Hz, actual 5000HZ div = 0)" messages gone :-) On Fri 2017-04-28 @ 03:58:57 PM, Romain Perier wrote: > Linux kernel 4.11 being released soon, bump recipe to 4.11-rc8. > >

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH 4/5] u-boot-rockchip: remove duplicated variables

/firefly-rk3288/layers/meta-rockchip/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-rockchip_git.bb But it does work if I add... On Fri 2017-04-28 @ 04:01:25 PM, Romain Perier wrote: > # Copyright (C) 2017 Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd > # Copyright (C) 2017 Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> >

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Building rpi-test-image for Pi3 64 bit

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Luca Carlon wrote: > I'm trying to build rpi-test-image for Raspberry Pi 3 64 bit but I'm getting > this error: https://pastebin.com/rYJ0PL7h. It seems it is looking for a file > that is not there, and I don't see it in the linux repo

  1   2   3   4   5   >