Re: [yocto] Postinstall scriptlets of ['coreutils'] have failed

> Am 10.09.2018 um 21:09 schrieb Martin Jansa : > > pn-buildlist isn't really useful in this case, building both coreutils and > busybox doesn't imply that both will be actually included in the image.. > > If you compare installed-package-names.txt in buildhistory you'll see that > only the

Re: [yocto] Postinstall scriptlets of ['coreutils'] have failed

pn-buildlist isn't really useful in this case, building both coreutils and busybox doesn't imply that both will be actually included in the image.. If you compare installed-package-names.txt in buildhistory you'll see that only the core-image-minimal-dev has coreutils installed. docker-shr

Re: [yocto] Postinstall scriptlets of ['coreutils'] have failed

Am 09.09.2018 um 20:56 schrieb Martin Jansa :Does core-image-minimal include both busybox and coreutils? Maybe only -dev include both.Unfortunately both include coreutils, see attached pn-buildlist (I can send you the recipe-depends and the task-depends, either if you need

Re: [yocto] Postinstall scriptlets of ['coreutils'] have failed

Does core-image-minimal include both busybox and coreutils? Maybe only -dev include both. I'll send fix for attr soon, waiting for some builds to finish testing it. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 8:47 PM Jens Rehsack wrote: > So far, so good. > > They way to fix that seems either to check why busybox

Re: [yocto] Postinstall scriptlets of ['coreutils'] have failed

So far, so good. They way to fix that seems either to check why busybox uses ${base_bindir} nowadays in favor of ${bindir} and fix either busybox or coreutils or attr. What drives me nuts is not only the failure after the busybox update - why does core-image-minimal builds successful while

Re: [yocto] Postinstall scriptlets of ['coreutils'] have failed

busybox is most likely the one providing it in ${base_bindir} Recent busybox upgrade probably moved this file. There is also conflict on /usr/bin/setfattr between busybox and attr now. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:22 PM Martin Jansa wrote: > There are 2 packages using u-a for nice, but one is

Re: [yocto] Postinstall scriptlets of ['coreutils'] have failed

There are 2 packages using u-a for nice, but one is using {bindir} and 2nd one is using {base_bindir} coreutils is using bindir, find what's using ${base_bindir} and change one of them to use the same u-a link as the other one. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 5:59 PM Jens Rehsack wrote: > > > Am

Re: [yocto] Postinstall scriptlets of ['coreutils'] have failed

> Am 09.09.2018 um 13:15 schrieb Alexander Kanavin : > > It's right in the message? > > ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: > /home/sno/gpw-community-bsp/mops-yocto-platform/tmp/work/fischer-poky-linux/core-image-minimal-dev/1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.27709 > > Alex It's not much what

Re: [yocto] Postinstall scriptlets of ['coreutils'] have failed

It's right in the message? ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /home/sno/gpw-community-bsp/mops-yocto-platform/tmp/work/fischer-poky-linux/core-image-minimal-dev/1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.27709 Alex 2018-09-09 10:58 GMT+02:00 Jens Rehsack : > Hi, > > I got following issue when building an

[yocto] Postinstall scriptlets of ['coreutils'] have failed

Hi, I got following issue when building an image for live-debugging: ERROR: updatable-app-dev-image-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Postinstall scriptlets of ['coreutils'] have failed. If the intention is to defer them to first boot, then please place them into pkg_postinst_ontarget_${PN} (). Deferring to