Rocky Burt wrote:
Max M wrote:
If there is another practical way to do it, that would be fine too. I
don't know about sqllite. But if it's more difficulte than dropping a
package into a directory it would be bad.
Personally I'd be a huge proponent of including SQLite in zope core.
robert rottermann schrieb:
Rocky Burt wrote:
Max M wrote:
If there is another practical way to do it, that would be fine too. I
don't know about sqllite. But if it's more difficulte than dropping a
package into a directory it would be bad.
Personally I'd be a huge proponent of
--On 22. Dezember 2005 12:32:07 +0100 Tino Wildenhain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I dont think we should inlcude more 3rd party products into zope core
unless they are required for core funtionality. And a random database
adaptor isnt really core functionality.
Another point: with Zope 2.10
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 22. Dezember 2005 12:32:07 +0100 Tino Wildenhain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont think we should inlcude more 3rd party products into zope core
unless they are required for core funtionality. And a random database
adaptor isnt really core functionality.
Another
--On 22. Dezember 2005 15:20:27 +0100 robert rottermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I perfectly agree with both of these arguments.
However having a dead easy to use RDBMS tool is very convenient. Both
for teaching and marketing purposes.
I agree (meanwhile) but we have to sort out the
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 22. Dezember 2005 15:20:27 +0100 robert rottermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I perfectly agree with both of these arguments.
However having a dead easy to use RDBMS tool is very convenient. Both
for teaching and marketing purposes.
I agree (meanwhile) but
--On 22. Dezember 2005 11:42:30 -0330 Rocky Burt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When you mentioned before about importing sqlite into svn.zope.org, you
were talking about actually including a snapshot of sqlite inside zope
source rather than making it a build time requirement?
I really don't
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 22. Dezember 2005 11:42:30 -0330 Rocky Burt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When you mentioned before about importing sqlite into svn.zope.org, you
were talking about actually including a snapshot of sqlite inside zope
source rather than making it a build time requirement?
sqlite is public domain code, FWIW. I doubt this is incompatible
with the ZPL. It would just require an acknowledgement from ZC that
it's safe to be included in a Zope distro.
- C
On Dec 22, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Rocky Burt wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 22. Dezember 2005 11:42:30 -0330
Rocky Burt wrote:
Well, if we simply suck sqlite in as a build time requirement (during
the 'make' process) do we care about importing non-ZPL code into
svn.zope.org? We would only care about licensing when distributing
binaries that include sqlite, no?
will this imply that I need to have
--On 22. Dezember 2005 12:44:23 -0330 Rocky Burt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, if we simply suck sqlite in as a build time requirement (during
the 'make' process) do we care about importing non-ZPL code into
svn.zope.org? We would only care about licensing when distributing
binaries that
Rocky Burt schrieb:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 22. Dezember 2005 15:20:27 +0100 robert rottermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I perfectly agree with both of these arguments.
However having a dead easy to use RDBMS tool is very convenient. Both
for teaching and marketing purposes.
I agree
Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
- Gadfly(DA) - do we really need this? We discussed this already. In my
opinion the purpose of Gadfly is only educational but nothing that one
really needs or uses for production. It could be removed and made
available for download on zope.org.
-1
From time
--On 21. Dezember 2005 17:10:19 +0100 Max M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there is another practical way to do it, that would be fine too. I
don't know about sqllite. But if it's more difficulte than dropping a
package into a directory it would be bad.
I mentioned to make it available as
Max M wrote:
If there is another practical way to do it, that would be fine too. I
don't know about sqllite. But if it's more difficulte than dropping a
package into a directory it would be bad.
Personally I'd be a huge proponent of including SQLite in zope core. It
is extraordinarilly
Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I'll raise the question again: what are the benefits of the HelpSys for
a Zope user?
I can't recall clicking on top frame of the ZMI or a 'Help!' link in the
past few years, either. Perhaps an equivalent or greater benefit would be
to rip out
--On 21. Dezember 2005 17:23:26 -0330 Rocky Burt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Personally I'd be a huge proponent of including SQLite in zope core. It
is extraordinarilly functional and has few requirements. I particularly
like using it to ensure unit tests against RDBMS connections work
Andreas Jung wrote:
for next release we plan to replace several parts with the corresponding
components from Zope 3 (e.g. ZPT´). Philipp is working on a proposal on
that issue. In addition I would like to get rid of some old stuff that
is no longer maintained and buggy:
- ZopeTutorial
--On 20. Dezember 2005 14:05:26 +0100 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Gadfly(DA) - do we really need this? We discussed this already. In my
opinion the purpose of Gadfly is only educational but nothing that one
really needs or uses for production. It could be removed and
Andreas Jung wrote:
I'll raise the question again: what are the benefits of the HelpSys for
a Zope user?
I can't recall clicking on top frame of the ZMI or a 'Help!' link in the
past few years, either. Perhaps an equivalent or greater benefit would be
to rip out locally installed static help
20 matches
Mail list logo
