Mozilla changes its vote to "no" on Ballot SC-74 with the understanding that additional edits are needed.
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 1:05 PM Ben Wilson <bwil...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Mozilla votes "yes" on Ballot SC-74. > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 3:06 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via > Servercert-wg <servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote: > >> HARICA votes "yes" to ballot SC-74. >> >> On 5/5/2024 11:24 π.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg >> wrote: >> >> Voting begins for ballot SC-74. >> SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647 Summary >> >> The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that: >> >> *"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be >> structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material >> required by RFC 3647."* >> >> The intent of this language was to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS >> documents contain a similar structure, making it easier to review and >> compare against the BRs. However, there was some ambiguity as to the actual >> structure that CAs should follow. After several discussions in the SCWG >> Public Mailing List >> <https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2023-November/004070.html> >> and F2F meetings, it was agreed that more clarity should be added to the >> existing requirement, pointing to the outline described in section 6 of RFC >> 3647. >> >> The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) >> and endorsed by Aaron Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek (Digicert). >> >> You can view the github pull request representing this ballot here >> <https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/503>. >> Motion Begins >> >> MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of >> Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as >> specified in the following redline: >> >> - >> >> https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae >> >> Motion Ends >> >> This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for >> approval of this ballot is as follows: >> Discussion (at least 7 days) >> >> - Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC >> - End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC >> >> Vote for approval (7 days) >> >> - Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC >> - End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Servercert-wg mailing >> listServercert-wg@cabforum.orghttps://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Servercert-wg mailing list >> Servercert-wg@cabforum.org >> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg >> >
_______________________________________________ Servercert-wg mailing list Servercert-wg@cabforum.org https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
