> The fix adds posting VmObjectAlloc events by Unsafe.allocateInstance(Class<?> 
> cls). The previous attempt to post event directly from 
> 'LibraryCallKit::inline_unsafe_allocate()' cause performance regression even 
> if jvmti event is not enabled.  Some optimizations have been disabled just 
> because possible usage and escaping of newly allocated  object.
> So event posting is doing by returning to interpreter if events are enabled.
> 
> I verified that that performance (run locally only) of
> org.renaissance.jdk.streams.JmhScrabble.runOperation
> doesn't change if events are not enabled.
> 
> There might be other intrinsics like 
> 'LibraryCallKit::inline_unsafe_newArray()' where VM allocate memory. I'm 
> going to file separate issue to find and fix them.
> 
> Many thanks to Tobias H. for proposed solution.
> 
> Testing with all tiers.

Leonid Mesnik has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

   combined jvmti code

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15110/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15110/files/07499679..5095114f

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=15110&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=15110&range=00-01

  Stats: 38 lines in 1 file changed: 17 ins; 21 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15110.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15110/head:pull/15110

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15110

Reply via email to