Go ahead.  I have no problem giving up qt5, qt5-webkit and PyQt5.  I don't
have time right now to test big packages like qt5.

--Larry

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 2:57 PM David Woodfall <d...@dawoodfall.net> wrote:

> On Wednesday 25 July 2018 08:57,
> or...@fredslev.dk <or...@fredslev.dk> put forth the proposition:
> > Given that you are doing great with Qt5 and that Larry has not even
> > bothered to reply to your python2-sip comment my suggestion is that you
> > should maintain Qt5 from this point on. You clearly seem the most
> > willing and capable.
>
> I have no problem with doing Qt5 and PyQt5 is Larry doesn't want to
> keep them updated.
>
> --
>
>                                                             .--.  oo
>                                                            (____)//
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>
_______________________________________________
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Reply via email to