Small correction: the 'original' version is David's (jakartaman).

For the rest I agree.

Regards,
    Erik.


Op 14-08-11 13:35, Thorsten Möller schreef:
Am 13.08.2011 um 22:17 schrieb jakartaman:

Now someone needs to take a decision!!11!!
Well, just my opinion: both make sense to me. Erik's original version clearly 
and tersely describes the (gradual) transition from a logging framework other 
than SLF4J up to the point where just SLF4J backed by Logback is used. And I 
presume depicting this transition was Erik's intention.

Ceki's version appeared more comprehensive to me in depicting all the 
combinations in which SLF4J can be deployed. Honestly, however, I was 
interrupted a bit by the arrows since their semantics is not intuitive and was 
also not explained in the legend. To me they are not really necessary and I 
would prefer the typical layered way of depicting it using vertically stacked 
boxes.

To conclude, both are reasonable to the projects documentation, just at different places: 
Erik's could be used for supporting one way (the preferred way?) of (gradually) moving 
from another logging framework to "pure" SLF4J logging; Ceki's could be used to 
support all the different deployment combinations.

Thorsten




:-)

On 08/13/2011 10:51 AM, Rusty Wright wrote:
I definitely like http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png

Straightforward and clear.

On 2011-08-12 12:32, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
I've taken yet another crack at this:

http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.odg
http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png

http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.odg
http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.png

The idea is to illustrate concrete binding setups using lots of arrows. :-)

On 12/08/2011 9:04 AM, Erik van Oosten wrote:
Hi David,

I liked the clearness of your images as the result of using no arrows
and different colors for each function. I did have troubles with the
text, the font size is a tad small for me.

The second image does not show that commons-logging attempts to find a
logging implementation such as log4j, nor that is specially wired in the
classpath of many servlet containers. Not sure how to do visualize that
though.

Regards,
Erik.

_______________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
_______________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
_______________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user


--
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
slf4j-user@qos.ch
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user

Reply via email to