Hi all,

I am currently aligned with Wendy’s and Judith’s concerns expressed on the
recent call about sunsetting the Legacy profile, but I look forward to
discussing this further in Bergamo. The Legacy profile provides greater
flexibility, and migrating to only the Multipurpose and Strict profiles may
have unforeseen consequences. While no one else has explicitly stated they
are not ready for this move, the Mozilla Root Program has integrated the
S/MIME BRs into our root store policy, necessitating support for diverse
use cases while ensuring broad compliance. We need to ensure that everyone
not involved in the S/MIME WG is prepared for such a significant move, and
we might find out about problems when it is too late to address them. For
instance, we could see compliance issues in Bugzilla from CA operators who
are currently enabled with the email trust bit, or we might receive a root
inclusion request from a CA operator unwilling or unable to restrict
issuance to only strict or multipurpose certificates.

In summary, I'd just like to understand the issues better and minimize
disruption and compliance issues down the road.

I look forward to your thoughts and suggestions.

Thanks,

Ben


On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 8:40 AM Stephen Davidson via Smcwg-public <
smcwg-public@cabforum.org> wrote:

> Hello all:
>
>
>
> I attach the summary that we reviewed in the SMCWG call yesterday.
>
>
>
> It highlights the differences between the Legacy generation profiles and
> the Multipurpose/Strict profiles, including links to the relevant text
> sections in the S/MIME BR.
>
>
>
>
> https://cabforum.org/posts/2024/2024-04-10-legacy-deprecation/SMCWG_20240410_Final.pdf
>
>
>
> This should facilitate review and feedback to help the SMCWG determine
> appropriate steps and timelines to migrate to the Multipurpose/Strict
> profiles.
>
>
>
> Regards, Stephen
> _______________________________________________
> Smcwg-public mailing list
> Smcwg-public@cabforum.org
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/smcwg-public
>
_______________________________________________
Smcwg-public mailing list
Smcwg-public@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/smcwg-public

Reply via email to