Aha!
Thanks for posting the update, Francois. That helps a lot. A From: Francois Clad <fclad.i...@gmail.com> Sent: 28 July 2023 18:38 To: adr...@olddog.co.uk Cc: spring <spring@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compress...@ietf.org Subject: Re: A question about draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression Hi Adrian, Thanks a lot for your feedback. We have received the assignments from IANA and updated the draft to reflect the same. My understanding is that all shipping implementations are using the assigned values from IANA. For the values just assigned, there are early implementations or POC code which will need to start using the new values before shipping. Note that there is a Private Use part of the registry available for early implementation and prototyping. Thanks, Francois On 26 Jul 2023 at 10:46:13, Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk <mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk> > wrote: Hi, You have an impressive Implementation Status section. Well done for compiling this and keeping it up to date. I note that a number of IANA assignments are marked as TBA while others have been assigned from the First Come First Served part of the registry. This leads me to two things: 1. Could you tweak the IANA considerations section to reflect the actual requests. For the code points that have already been assigned, I think the action you are requesting is that IANA simply update the reference to point to this document's RFC number when it is published. 2. What does the non-assignment of some of the code points tell us about the implementations? Have they squatted on code points? Do they stand a chance of interoperating? Have they not implemented part of the document? 3. That second point leads me to wonder how fully-scoped the implementations are. Are there elements of the document that everyone has implemented? Are there parts that no one has implemented? Part of the reason for 7942 is to help understand the robustness of the specification, and (of course) the absence of implementation of some aspects might mean that they are less well proven, and possibly even unwanted. 4. Is there any reason to not request First Come First Served assignment of the remaining code points? Cheers, Adrian
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
