Since the difference is in the fraction part, i'd vote for the floating-point problem. I'have encountered this issue with all machines I've tried, however, both my laptop and koji build systems are natively 64bit. (my cpuinfo attached)
2017-01-05 11:08 GMT+01:00 Graham Holden <sql...@aldurslair.com>: > I don't know what the tests are doing, but could it be connected with the > fact that a leap-second was added as we changed from 2016 to 2017 and one > of expected/got is taking this into account and the other isn't? > Graham > -------- Original message --------From: Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> > Date: 05/01/2017 08:12 (GMT+00:00) To: SQLite mailing list < > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org> Subject: Re: [sqlite] date-2.2c > tests fail for sqlite-3.16.1 on Fedora / i686 > On 1/4/17, Jakub Dorňák <jakub.dor...@misli.cz> wrote: > > Example output: > > > > ... > > ! date-2.2c-1 expected: [06:28:00.001] > > ! date-2.2c-1 got: [06:28:00.000] > > ! date-2.2c-4 expected: [06:28:00.004] > > ! date-2.2c-4 got: [06:28:00.003] > > ! date-2.2c-7 expected: [06:28:00.007] > > ! date-2.2c-7 got: [06:28:00.006] > > ! date-2.2c-8 expected: [06:28:00.008] > > ! date-2.2c-8 got: [06:28:00.007] > > ... > > This is probably a function of the underlying floating-point hardware. > What CPU is this running on? > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- Jakub Dorňák, Prostřední Poříčí 19, 679 62 Telefon: 728 808 795 _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
