On Apr 23, 2017 11:21 PM, "Tony Anderson" <t...@olenepal.org> wrote:
Hi James, Walter I reviewed the 71 activities for which I created a repository in github/sugarlabs Thank you Tony! Unless I hear to the contrary, I'll delete these duplicates. Sounds good to me My understanding from the community is that activity repositoies on git.sugarlabs.org should be considered the 'master' copy and ported to github, Yes, my understanding too - and after porting to github.com/sugarlabs then that is the master copy James has raised the point that adding some 600 repositories to github/sugarlabs makes reviewing the repositories more difficult. I would advocate Ignacio's idea that we have a github/sugaractivitiies which would leave the sugarlabs repositories for Sugar. I disagree, I think a regular repo naming pattern and github search can mitigate this reviewing concern, and using 2 orgs makes **searching** all of the sugar codebase more difficult, which I think matters In the meantime, I plan to do nothing more on this project until there is a clear direction from the community on how it is to be done. My goal is to get repositories on github corresponding to each activity in ASLO so that we can eliminate the 'developer web', I think it's a great goal!!
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel