> Am 07.06.2016 um 22:56 schrieb Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org>: > > My response was simply to say that Never or NoReturn would in fact be a type, > which is a good justification for looking like one. This behavior would be > learnable and is theoretically sound, not an ad hoc idea being made up on the > spot. No doubt, @noreturn is clearer today, but how much of that is because > it's what we already know? And FWIW, "returns never" is hard to misinterpret, > no? >
I disagree about the theoretical soundness here. It is implementable and doesn't introduce ambiguities, that's all IMHO. -Michael _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
