I guess for me it comes down to this:

Why were some and none chosen for as the cases for Optional?

As an extension of that, why does nil then represent none instead of the 
obvious none?

There has to be a reason why it's not:

enum Optional<T> {
case some(T)
case nil
}

None seems a lot more expressive and consistent with Optional. 

I am comfortable and use to nil, but with swift being a new language, I thought 
it was worth opening up a discussion about possibly changing direction a little 
here. 

Thanks,
Brandon 

> On Jun 7, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Jordan Rose <jordan_r...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> There are NilLiteralConvertible types other than Optional, but they’re 
> dwindling now that pointer nullability is represented by Optional. That said, 
> I’m not convinced renaming “nil” is worth it at this point. Similarity with 
> other languages is still a good thing.
> 
> It’s true that we might not have picked nil if it hadn’t been for 
> Objective-C, but that doesn’t make it an invalid choice. There are lots of 
> things in Swift we might have done differently if it weren’t for Objective-C 
> and Cocoa.
> 
> Jordan
> 
> 
>> On Jun 5, 2016, at 12:35, Brandon Knope via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Quick thought:
>> 
>> If optional has a .none case, wouldn't it be more consistent to rename nil 
>> to none?
>> 
>> Also, would nil make it into Swift if not for other languages?
>> 
>> It also might make it somewhat clearer:
>> 
>> var someInt: Int? = none //looks less like a pointer and more like a value 
>> of nothing 
>> 
>> 1. It is more consistent with the optional enum
>> 2. The intent is arguably clearer
>> 3. nil makes it seem like it's a pointer 
>> 4. Would nil be included if not for prior languages? Would "none" have been 
>> chosen as the keyword if nil wasn't prior art?
>> 
>> One disadvantage is how close it is to .none, but with how common nil/none 
>> is used, some syntactic sugar might make it look nicer than always having 
>> the stray .
>> 
>> On vacation from Orlando, poolside, with a quick thought,
>> Brandon 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to