Can’t the key location be inferred by the fact it is within a country bounds rather than redundantly added?
Gareth > On 9 Apr 2020, at 14:46, Tony OSM <tonyo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That makes perfect sense to me. > > Any other views? > > Tony > >> On 09/04/2020 14:31, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: >>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 14:26, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) >>> <robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 09:21, Tony OSM <tonyo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> If the data is to be in the public domain the next step has to be tagging. >>>> Do we need country specific tags for these two pieces of data? >>>> What should they be? >> [snip] >>> So I'd propose that we use either ref:uprn and ref:usrn, or >>> ref:UK:uprn and ref:UK:usrn. What does everyone else think? >> Oops. If we were to use the ISO Alpha-2 country codes, it should of >> course be GB rather then UK. So that would make the keys ref:GB:uprn >> and ref:GB:usrn . >> >> Robert. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb