We may need to roll back to 1.0.1 since the open() problem caused all mock test cases to hang and time out. 1.0.2 is also 15MB in size and I guess it is close to 1.0.3.
Let us see if there is any way to fix the open() problem, if not, we will revert the upgrade of 1.0.3. Thanks, Jian On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Haroon Rasheed <haroonz...@gmail.com>wrote: > Does that have support for Firefox 3.6 on the snow leopard??? This was > requested by one of our users and therefore we upgraded to 1.0.3. > > > > On 23 March 2010 16:12, Haroon Rasheed <haroonz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> For 1.0.3 when you launch the tests, then the test runner shows 2.0a which >> is a selenium 2 thing. I think they just built a jar file and then made that >> available via www.seleniumhq.org. >> >> >> On 23 March 2010 16:10, Jian Fang <john.jian.f...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> From their source SVN repo, I cannot find the 1.0.3 release tag. Not sure >>> where is the code base for 1.0.3 release. >>> >>> http://code.google.com/p/selenium/source/browse/#svn/selenium-rc >>> >>> BTW, their code base is really a mess. >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Jian Fang <john.jian.f...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> After look closer, the bad thing is that they merged in some web driver >>>> stuff, which I am not sure >>>> if there are used or just show up there. This release is really bloated. >>>> I will try my best to strip out >>>> some of the dependencies. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Jian Fang <john.jian.f...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, I noticed that the size of the downloaded selenium server from >>>>> openQA has been doubled. >>>>> We will try to strip out the unneeded packages. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Jian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:06 AM, dominicm >>>>> <dominic.moo...@betfair.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I've noticed that the 1.0.3 server is 17Mb in size and seems to >>>>>> contain all sorts of stuff not necessary for a release version (e.g. >>>>>> jMockery). Could you please take a look as this is causing a few >>>>>> problems with our Maven build due to multiple instances of various >>>>>> dependencies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "tellurium-users" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to tellurium-users@googlegroups.com >>>>>> . >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> tellurium-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<tellurium-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> >>>>>> . >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "tellurium-users" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to tellurium-us...@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> tellurium-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<tellurium-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en. >>> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "tellurium-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to tellurium-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > tellurium-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<tellurium-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tellurium-users" group. To post to this group, send email to tellurium-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tellurium-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.
