On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:46 AM Lukas Brabec <lbra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 2. Blocker Bugs App (BBA) detects the new blocker and creates a new
> ticket in Pagure in the "fedora-blockers" project, then updates the bug to
> link to this ticket (a new comment, a Links entry). It shows both the bug
> and the discussion ticket in its UI.
>
> What about fedora-blockers group with FXX-{{Beta,
> Final}-Blockers,{Beta, Final}-FEs} projects. Issues would be filed
> against appropriate project in that group. I like the added hierarchy
> and that F32-Final-Blockers would have only relevant issues. Or does
> this sound too complicated?
>
The proposed milestone is often not the milestone we approve it for. For
example it might be proposed for Beta, but we agree that's a Final blocker.
How would you handle ticket transfers between projects?
Also, often a bug is a Final blocker and a Beta FE. How would you handle a
ticket that needs to be part of several projects?
Additionally, people would need to subscribe to all projects if they wanted
to receive notifications for new proposed blockers, and they would need to
repeat it every time a new release appears (because we'd create new
projects in that group every time a new Fedora is branched).
I think all of that is much easier solved by tags. Tags for F31, F32, etc,
tags for blocker/FE, tags for proposed/agreed. The only concern is not
getting out of sync with information in Bugzilla and BBA. Perhaps we don't
need tags at all, and can instead improve BBA to show us historical
bugs/tickets. Or perhaps the sync issues are not such a problem. Shrug.
>
>
> > 5. Once some kind of understanding of the issue is formed, a privileged
> member (e.g. a member of @fedora-qa FAS group) can start the vote by
> including a command in his comment, e.g. "START VOTE" on a separate line.
> (Note that this is just a proposal. We can easily let anyone start the
> vote, or we can allow voting right from the beginning without an explicit
> start.)
>
> I'd allow voting right from the beginning, OTOH I think we would often
> see a lot of votes, then proper discussion and RESTART command after
> that. We can try both (explicit START and right from the beginning)
> and see which is better.
>
Yeah, already replied to Frantisek, voting from the beginning seems like a
better option.
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
