Le dimanche 10 juin 2012 20:01:11, Michael Matz a écrit : > Hi, > > On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Daniel Glöckner wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 09:15:52AM +0200, Michael Matz wrote: > >> Thomas: as you were last fiddling with arm, you might want to check > >> if the test works on it. The other alloca testcase is #ifdef'ed on > >> i386 and x86_64, but that only makes sense if alloca really isn't > >> supported on arm, which I can't believe. If that really is the case > >> callsave_test() needs to be conditional too. > > > > Some time ago I posted an alloca version for ARM: > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2011-02/msg00046.html > > Ah, I see. Well, alloca is highly desirable to have IMHO, so ... > > > but we don't build a libtcc1 for ARM > > ... I think we should do so then. As it seems the various arithmetic > routines of libtcc1.c aren't needed on arm it would only contain alloca. > I'd vote for the assembler implementation (don't know if it would have to > differ between the eabi and oldabi variants).
It doesn't use VFP so it will work for both ABI. It also work for the new eabihf which I introduced as there is no float parameter. > > > Ciao, > Michael. Best regards, Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
