Hi, On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Мельников Алексей wrote:
I hope TCC already has supported some C99 options: (Online documents "3.2 ISOC99 extensions"). And I have found this options (C99 tokens) was discussed several years ago: ---------------------------- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2007-05/msg00067.html ---------------------------- Yep. Section 7.9, and required in freestanding implementations. At least it's easy to support. For a trickier situation, I don't think tcc supports C99 alternate punctuators yet (section 6.4.6): <: :> <% %> %: %:%: Note that they have to retain these spellings under stringization, so it's presumably more than just a quick tweak to the parsing code. -Dave Dodge --------------------------- Please, could You send me the patch? Thank You in advance.
Urgs. Are you really using digraphs in any production code?(Yes, tcc tries to support c99, but, well, I mean, digraphs? Seriously? If you use EBCDIC you have more serious problems with tcc I guess, and if you don't, why use digraphs? Not as bad as trigraphs, but still.)
Ciao, Michael.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
