Hi, On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, Christian Jullien wrote:
> Ooops, not quite. > I missed this line on log file (from Fedora 29). > Btw, as suggested by ./configure, Fedora 29 requires --with-selinux > > ------------ dlltest ------------ > ../tcc -B.. -I../include -I.. -I.. -DCONFIG_LDDIR="\"lib64\"" > -DTCC_TARGET_X86_64 -DHAVE_SELINUX -DLIBTCC_AS_DLL ../libtcc.c -lm -ldl > -shared -o libtcc2.so > make[1]: *** [Makefile:132: dlltest] Segmentation fault (core dumped) Different bug? I don't have fedora 29 so can't debug this myself, what does the gdb backtrace look like for the coredump (to make that easier, build tcc with '-O0 -g', not the default -O2, i.e. change CFLAGS in config.mak). Ciao, Michael. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] > On Behalf Of Michael Matz > Sent: lundi 4 mars 2019 16:58 > To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC segfault on Fedora 29 > > Hi, > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019, Klaus Ebbe Grue wrote: > > > Is there news on the Fedora 29 segfault problem? > > No, as nobody provided the breaking crt*.o files ... > > > > some time. Alternatively: somebody can send me their /usr/lib64/crt*.o > > > files from a system where the segfault reproduces. It's some unhandled > > > > I have included my /usr/lib64/crt*.o files, if that helps (I hope the > > mailing list accepts attachments). > > ... until now. Fixed in mob. > > > Ciao, > Michael. > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
