On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 14:02, Andreas Pretzsch wrote: > So how to proceed with the sspi command ?
i think any proposals pending for the sspi command could be handled with a better hush implementation, so i'd prefer to go that route as the "bigger picture" > Also, given any rework of the sspi command, cmd_spi.c should probably be > checkpatch-massaged (9 errors, 11 warnings, incl. kernel-stuff) before. > The usual whitespace and line length issues. > I suppose this would go in despite merge window closure, but any other > change won't, so submit it as separate patch instead of a series ? a single patch to address all the checkpatch warnings is fine -mike _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot