On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:23 +0000, yareckon wrote: > Looks like there is a patch to gvfs upstream. Looks like it it is still > a bit of a workaround? > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627567#c9 Tomas seems to > indicate this is originally a problem with fuse? Should we be worried > about issues with other backends that use fuse?
Yes, it's possible that the bug affects all fuse backends and not only the gvfs one -- but there has been no answer from the fuse developers so fa as far as I know. The bug is bad enough that I believe we shouldn't wait until fuse developers speak up and fix it (or work around the problem), at least for now, directly in the gvfs. -- Sent from Ubuntu -- Empty files written over gvfs by some editors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658069 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
