** Description changed:

  [Links]
  https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/security/advisories/GHSA-qpjc-vq3c-572j ( 
CVE-2021-43860 )
  https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-43860
  
  https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/security/advisories/GHSA-8ch7-5j3h-g4fx ( 
CVE-2022-21682 )
  https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-21682
  
  [Impact]
  Versions in Ubuntu right now:
  Jammy: 1.12.2-2
  Impish: 1.10.2-3ubuntu0.1
  Focal: 1.6.5-0ubuntu0.4
  Bionic: 1.0.9-0ubuntu0.4
  
  Affected versions:
      all
  
  Patched versions:
-     1.12.3, 1.10.6
+     1.12.4, 1.10.7
  
  [Test Case]
  Unknown
  
  [Regression Potential]
  Flatpak has a test suite, which is run on build across all relevant 
architectures and passes.
  
  There is also a manual test plan
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak .
  
  Flatpak has autopkgtests enabled
  http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak .
  
  Regression potential is low, and upstream is very responsive to any
  issues raised.
  
  [Patches]
  The first CVE has 4 patches (+ 1 test patch), the second CVE has 1 patch (+ 6 
doc/test patches).
  
  [Other Information]
  
  For the first advisory with the CVE:
  
  Ryan Gonzalez discovered that Flatpak doesn't properly validate that the
  permissions displayed to the user for an app at install time match the
  actual permissions granted to the app at runtime, in the case that
  there's a null byte in the metadata file of an app. Therefore apps can
  grant themselves permissions without the consent of the user.
  
  Flatpak shows permissions to the user during install by reading them
  from the "xa.metadata" key in the commit metadata. This cannot contain a
  null terminator, because it is an untrusted GVariant. Flatpak compares
  these permissions to the actual metadata, from the "metadata" file to
  ensure it wasn't lied to.
  
  However, the actual metadata contents are loaded in several places where
  they are read as simple C-style strings. That means that, if the
  metadata file includes a null terminator, only the content of the file
  from before the terminator gets compared to xa.metadata. Thus, any
  permissions that appear in the metadata file after a null terminator are
  applied at runtime but not shown to the user. Maliciously crafted apps
  can use this to give themselves hidden permissions.
  
  In addition, a similar weakness was discovered, where if the permissions
  in the summary metadata are invalid, they would not be displayed to the
  user, but the the actual permissions would be granted, even though it
  didn't match the invalid version.
  
- 
  For the second advisory:
  
  flatpak-builder applies finish-args last in the build. At this point the
  build directory will have the full access that is specified in the
  manifest, so running flatpak build against it will gain that
  permissions. Normally this will not be done, so this is not problem.
  However, if --mirror-screenshots-url is specified, then flatpak-builder
  will launch flatpak build --nofilesystem=host appstream-utils mirror-
  screenshots after finalization, which can lead to issues even with the
  --nofilesystem=host protection.
  
  There are two issues:
  
-     --nofilesystem=host only overrides the access to the full host. The app 
can still request access to a specific directory, like --filesystem=~/some-dir, 
which is not affected by this.
-     If a filesystem is specified like --filesystem=~/foobar:create, then that 
directory will be created before running the command.
+     --nofilesystem=host only overrides the access to the full host. The app 
can still request access to a specific directory, like --filesystem=~/some-dir, 
which is not affected by this.
+     If a filesystem is specified like --filesystem=~/foobar:create, then that 
directory will be created before running the command.
  
  In normal use the only issue is that these empty directories can be
  created wherever the user has write permissions. However, a malicious
  application could replace the appstream-util binary and potentially do
  something more hostile.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957716

Title:
  Update for CVE-2021-43860 and CVE-2022-21682

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1957716/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to