We don't implement OPTIMIZATION_NODE and TARGET_OPTION_NODE streaming: case OPTIMIZATION_NODE: case TARGET_OPTION_NODE: // FIXME: Our representation for these two nodes is a cache of // the resulting set of options. Not a record of the options // that got changed by a particular attribute or pragma. Should // we record that, or should we record the diff from the command // line options? The latter seems the right behaviour, but is // (a) harder, and I guess could introduce strangeness if the // importer has set some incompatible set of optimization flags? gcc_unreachable (); break;
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945364 Title: C++-20 module: internal compiler error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1945364/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs