On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:14:06AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > Do you have evidence that has actually happened to anyone in this > case? I was able to vote quite easily, and it seems (from your ML > comments) that both Christian and yourself were as well, and Christian > provided explicit steps earlier in this email thread.
The low turnout so far suggests that there might be a problem. I've additionally had one piece of feedback ending in "...so I gave up. Maybe others did too"[1]. > Can you clarify what will happen at the announced end of the election > tomorrow? Will the election end, or will you extend it? What is the > criteria you will use to decide to extend or adjust the election? > What's the next steps if the election is extended? I have yet to decide. Feedback from others appreciated. One thing I might try to do is arrange a mailshot directly myself - perhaps using my @canonical.com address - since I think that might get through to Gmail users OK. This would be just to alert the electorate to the existing posts to ubuntu-devel-announce@ and ubuntu-devel@. I could just provide archive links. I can't differentiate between people who have voted and people who have not, so this would have to go to everyone I have down as eligible (for whom I have a valid address). Robie [1] With my help in identifying the correct alias this person reports they have now voted, so that's good.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
