On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:49 AM Lukasz Zemczak
<lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Christian!
>
> This sounds bad indeed, let's see what Matthew has to say. In the
> meantime I have backed it out from both bionic-security and
> focal-security.

Thank you

> Should we also consider dropping it from -updates?

Well, compared to other cases in this case we don't even yet have a
"ok this is a mess, but this is how you can resolve it afterwards to
work again".
Therefore I think pulling it from -updates as well makes sense until
Matthew had time to look at it in detail and give all-clear (or not).

P.S.: you slightly raced vorlon who had a different assessment
  [09:30] <vorlon> cpaelzer: well, by this point almost everyone will
have picked it up from security via unattended-upgrades so there's not
much point
But having it pulled for now is on the safe-side and we can re-instate
it at any time once we know more.

> Cheers,
>
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 09:01, Christian Ehrhardt
> <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > I was looking at 16 recently touched bugs. Of these a few needed a comment 
> > or
> > task update but not a lot of work. Worth to mention are two of them.
> >
> > First we've had "one more" kind of conflicting mysql packages from
> > third party breaking install/upgrade of the one provided by Ubuntu. I
> > dupped it onto bug 1771630 which is our single place to unite all
> > those.
> >
> >
> > A recent sssd update (driven by SEG) seems to have regressed users
> > that now end in a hang.
> > I've pinged on [1], subscribed Matthew (and our Team) on [2]. I've
> > marked it regression-update and also pinged Matthew him via Chat.
> > Furthermore I've set him on CC on this mail.
> > @Matthew - once you've done your initial assessment would you mind
> > replying here with the next steps on this case please?
> > I've marked it prio high, if other triagers see more such reports
> > please mark it even critical then (in that case it is less likely to
> > be just one odd special setup)
> > The release is 21h ago, I'll ping ubuntu-archive (also on CC) if we
> > should - for now until clarified by Matthew - remove it from
> > -security.
> >
> >
> > [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/comments/86
> > [2]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1906673
> >
> >
> > --
> > Christian Ehrhardt
> > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
> > Canonical Ltd
> >
> > --
> > ubuntu-archive mailing list
> > ubuntu-arch...@lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-archive
>
>
>
> --
> Ɓukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
>  Foundations Team
>  lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com
>  www.canonical.com



-- 
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Reply via email to