> > I wonder why XP is different? > Most likely the reason is different power profiles (by default XP has > EIST off).
I reposted on this - XP actually behaves the same way as 7. > > Win7 reports 1.33Ghz > > CPUZ reports 1.66Ghz > > So is this just a Win7 reporting bug? > I guess it's rather CPU-Z reporting bug (or feature, they may just be > not interested in the *actual* state). > You should try Intel's own utility: > http://www.intel.com/support/processors/tools/piu/ Intel's own utility shows 1.66Ghz In power management, if I set max processor state to 50%, Intels app shows 0.99GHz, CPUZ shows 0.99Ghz with multiplier = 0.6, Win7 continues to report 1.33GHz, and a Windows desktop processor monitor I'm using shows 799MHz (I have tried a few and they all show the same). Certainly inconsistency here. -- Atom N280 frequency scaling not supported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs