I mean region number is small.

Overall I have say 3000 region on 4 node, while this table only have 96 region. 
It won't be 24 for each region server, instead , will be something like 
19/30/23/21 etc.

This means that I need to limit the slop to 0.02 etc? so that the balancer 
actually run on this table?

Best Regards,
Raymond Liu

From: Marcos Ortiz [mailto:mlor...@uci.cu] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:44 AM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Cc: Liu, Raymond
Subject: Re: Is there any way to balance one table?

What is the size of your table?
On 02/19/2013 10:40 PM, Liu, Raymond wrote:
Hi

I do call balancer, while it seems it doesn't work. Might due to this table is 
small and overall region number difference is within threshold?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari [mailto:jean-m...@spaggiari.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:59 AM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is there any way to balance one table?

Hi Liu,

Why did not you simply called the balancer? If other tables are already
balanced, it should not touch them and will only balance the table which is not
balancer?

JM

2013/2/19, Liu, Raymond <raymond....@intel.com>:
I choose to move region manually. Any other approaching?


0.94.1

Any cmd in shell? Or I need to change balance threshold to 0 an run
global balancer cmd in shell?



Best Regards,
Raymond Liu

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhih...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:09 AM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is there any way to balance one table?

What version of HBase are you using ?

0.94 has per-table load balancing.

Cheers

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Liu, Raymond
<raymond....@intel.com>
wrote:

Hi

Is there any way to balance just one table? I found one of my
table is not balanced, while all the other table is balanced. So
I want to fix this table.

Best Regards,
Raymond Liu




-- 
Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda, 
Product Manager && Data Scientist at UCI
Blog: http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com
Twitter: @marcosluis2186

Reply via email to