Good catch! Yes I meant 1.0 and later.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Kexin Xie <kexin....@bigcommerce.com> wrote: > +1 on Option (B) with flag to allow semantics in (A) for back compatibility. > > Kexin > > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Nicholas Chammas > <nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> (B) Semantics in Spark 1.0 and earlier: >> >> >> Do you mean 1.0 and later? >> >> Option (B) with the exception-on-clobber sounds fine to me, btw. My use >> pattern is probably common but not universal, and deleting user files is >> indeed scary. >> >> Nick > >