Good catch! Yes I meant 1.0 and later.

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Kexin Xie <kexin....@bigcommerce.com> wrote:
> +1 on Option (B) with flag to allow semantics in (A) for back compatibility.
>
> Kexin
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Nicholas Chammas
> <nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> (B) Semantics in Spark 1.0 and earlier:
>>
>>
>> Do you mean 1.0 and later?
>>
>> Option (B) with the exception-on-clobber sounds fine to me, btw. My use
>> pattern is probably common but not universal, and deleting user files is
>> indeed scary.
>>
>> Nick
>
>

Reply via email to