Cheng, We tried this setting and it still did not help. This was on Spark
1.2.0.


--
Kannan

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Cheng Lian <lian.cs....@gmail.com> wrote:

>  (Move to user list.)
>
> Hi Kannan,
>
> You need to set mapred.map.tasks to 1 in hive-site.xml. The reason is this
> line of code
> <https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala#L68>,
> which overrides spark.default.parallelism. Also,
> spark.sql.shuffle.parallelism isn’t used here since there’s no shuffle
> involved (we only need to sort within a partition).
>
> Default value of mapred.map.tasks is 2
> <https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r1.0.4/mapred-default.html>. You may see
> that the Spark SQL result can be divided into two sorted parts from the
> middle.
>
> Cheng
>
> On 2/19/15 10:33 AM, Kannan Rajah wrote:
>
>   According to hive documentation, "sort by" is supposed to order the results
> for each reducer. So if we set a single reducer, then the results should be
> sorted, right? But this is not happening. Any idea why? Looks like the
> settings I am using to restrict the number of reducers is not having an
> effect.
>
> *Tried the following:*
>
> Set spark.default.parallelism to 1
>
> Set spark.sql.shuffle.partitions to 1
>
> These were set in hive-site.xml and also inside spark shell.
>
>
> *Spark-SQL*
>
> create table if not exists testSortBy (key int, name string, age int);
> LOAD DATA LOCAL INPATH '/home/mapr/sample-name-age.txt' OVERWRITE INTO TABLE
> testSortBy;
> select * from testSortBY;
>
> 1    Aditya    28
> 2    aash    25
> 3    prashanth    27
> 4    bharath    26
> 5    terry    27
> 6    nanda    26
> 7    pradeep    27
> 8    pratyay    26
>
>
> set spark.default.parallelism=1;
>
> set spark.sql.shuffle.partitions=1;
>
> select name,age from testSortBy sort by age; aash 25 bharath 26 prashanth
> 27 Aditya 28 nanda 26 pratyay 26 terry 27 pradeep 27 *HIVE* select name,age
> from testSortBy sort by age;
>
> aash    25
> bharath    26
> nanda    26
> pratyay    26
> prashanth    27
> terry    27
> pradeep    27
> Aditya    28
>
>
> --
> Kannan
>
>
>   ​
>

Reply via email to