In that case, having pre configured pools, but using the correct pool at
code level might do.

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:23 AM, abhi <abhishek...@gmail.com> wrote:

> yes .
> Each generated job can have a different priority it is like a recursive
> function, where in each iteration generate job will be submitted to the
> spark cluster based on the priority.  jobs will lower priority or less than
> some threshold will be discarded.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhi
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:36 PM, twinkle sachdeva <
> twinkle.sachd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Abhi,
>>
>> You mean each task of a job can have different priority or job generated
>> via one job can have different priority?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Mark Hamstra <m...@clearstorydata.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Job-priority-td10076.html#a10079
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:26 PM, abhi <abhishek...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If i understand correctly , the above document creates pool for
>>>> priority which is static in nature and has to be defined before submitting
>>>> the job . .in my scenario each generated task can have different priority.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Abhi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:48 PM, twinkle sachdeva <
>>>> twinkle.sachd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe this is what you are looking for :
>>>>> http://spark.apache.org/docs/1.2.0/job-scheduling.html#fair-scheduler-pools
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:15 PM, abhi <abhishek...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>> Current all the jobs in spark gets submitted using queue . i have a
>>>>>> requirement where submitted job will generate another set of jobs with 
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> priority , which should again be submitted to spark cluster based on
>>>>>> priority ? Means job with higher priority should be executed first,    Is
>>>>>> it feasible  ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any help is appreciated ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Abhi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to