Hi Ted

Will you be able to guide me for any sample code for achieving this?

On 17 April 2015 at 02:30, Jeetendra Gangele <gangele...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can you please guide me how can I extend RDD and convert into this way you
> are suggesting.
>
> On 16 April 2015 at 23:46, Jeetendra Gangele <gangele...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I type T i already have Object ... I have RDD<Object> and then I am
>> calling ZipWithIndex on this RDD and getting RDD<Object,Long> on this I am
>> running MapToPair and converting into RDD<Long,Object> so that i can use it
>> later for other operation like lookup and join.
>>
>>
>> On 16 April 2015 at 23:42, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The Long in RDD[(T, Long)] is type parameter. You can create RDD with
>>> Integer as the first type parameter.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jeetendra Gangele <
>>> gangele...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ted.
>>>> This works for me. But since Long takes here 8 bytes. Can I reduce it
>>>> to 4 bytes. its just a index and I feel 4 bytes was more than enough.is
>>>> there any method which takes Integer or similar for Index?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 13 April 2015 at 01:59, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> bq. will return something like JavaPairRDD<Object, long>
>>>>>
>>>>> The long component of the pair fits your description of index. What
>>>>> other requirement does ZipWithIndex not provide you ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jeetendra Gangele <
>>>>> gangele...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All I have an RDD JavaRDD<Object> and I want to convert it to
>>>>>> JavaPairRDD<Index,Object>.. Index should be unique and it should maintain
>>>>>> the order. For first object It should have 1 and then for second 2 like
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried using ZipWithIndex but it will return something like
>>>>>> JavaPairRDD<Object, long>
>>>>>> I wanted to use this RDD for lookup and join operation later in my
>>>>>> workflow so ordering is important.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> jeet
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to