@Vadim What happened when you tried unioning using DStream.union in python?

TD

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Evo Eftimov <evo.efti...@isecc.com> wrote:

> I can confirm it does work in Java
>
>
>
> *From:* Vadim Bichutskiy [mailto:vadim.bichuts...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 12, 2015 5:53 PM
> *To:* Evo Eftimov
> *Cc:* Saisai Shao; user@spark.apache.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: DStream Union vs. StreamingContext Union
>
>
>
> Thanks Evo. I tried chaining Dstream unions like what you have and it
> didn't work for me. But passing
>
> multiple arguments to StreamingContext.union worked fine. Any idea why? I
> am using Python, BTW.
>
> ᐧ
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Evo Eftimov <evo.efti...@isecc.com>
> wrote:
>
> You can also union multiple DstreamRDDs in this way
> DstreamRDD1.union(DstreamRDD2).union(DstreamRDD3)  etc etc
>
>
>
> Ps: the API is not “redundant” it offers several ways for achivieving the
> same thing as a convenience depending on the situation
>
>
>
> *From:* Vadim Bichutskiy [mailto:vadim.bichuts...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 12, 2015 5:37 PM
> *To:* Saisai Shao
> *Cc:* user@spark.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: DStream Union vs. StreamingContext Union
>
>
>
> Thanks Saisai. That makes sense. Just seems redundant to have both.
>
> ᐧ
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> DStream.union can only union two DStream, one is itself. While
> StreamingContext.union can union an array of DStreams, internally
> DStream.union is a special case of StreamingContext.union:
>
>
>
> def union(that: DStream[T]): DStream[T] = new UnionDStream[T](Array(this,
> that))
>
>
>
> So there's no difference, if you want to union more than two DStreams,
> just use the one in StreamingContext, otherwise, both two APIs are fine.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2015-05-12 6:49 GMT+08:00 Vadim Bichutskiy <vadim.bichuts...@gmail.com>:
>
> Can someone explain to me the difference between DStream union and
> StreamingContext union?
>
> When do you use one vs the other?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vadim
>
> ᐧ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to