Thank you, Jie! Very nice work! -- Nan Zhu http://codingcat.me
On Friday, June 26, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Huang, Jie wrote: > Correct. Your calculation is right! > > We have been aware of that kmeans performance drop also. According to our > observation, it is caused by some unbalanced executions among different > tasks. Even we used the same test data between different versions (i.e., not > caused by the data skew). > > And the corresponding run time information has been shared with Xiangrui. Now > he is also helping to identify the root cause altogether. > > Thank you && Best Regards, > Grace （Huang Jie) > > From: Nan Zhu [mailto:zhunanmcg...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 7:59 PM > To: Huang, Jie > Cc: user@spark.apache.org (mailto:user@spark.apache.org); > d...@spark.apache.org (mailto:d...@spark.apache.org) > Subject: Re: [SparkScore]Performance portal for Apache Spark - WW26 > > Hi, Jie, > > > > Thank you very much for this work! Very helpful! > > > > I just would like to confirm that I understand the numbers correctly: if we > take the running time of 1.2 release as 100s > > > > 9.1% - means the running time is 109.1 s? > > > > -4% - means it comes 96s? > > > > If that’s the true meaning of the numbers, what happened to k-means in > HiBench? > > > > Best, > > > > -- > > Nan Zhu > > http://codingcat.me > > > > > On Friday, June 26, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Huang, Jie wrote: > > Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2697 > > > > > > > >
