I'm not an authoritative source but I think it is indeed the plan to move the default build to 2.11.
See this discussion for more detail http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/A-proposal-for-Spark-2-0-td15122.html On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Deenar Toraskar <deenar.toras...@gmail.com> wrote: > A related question. Are the plans to move the default Spark builds to Scala > 2.11 with Spark 2.0? > > Regards > Deenar > > On 27 January 2016 at 19:55, Michael Armbrust <mich...@databricks.com> > wrote: >> >> We do maintenance releases on demand when there is enough to justify doing >> one. I'm hoping to cut 1.6.1 soon, but have not had time yet. >> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Siegmann >> <daniel.siegm...@teamaol.com> wrote: >>> >>> Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during the >>> additional time for bug fixes and such? >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> thanks thats all i needed >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code >>>>> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this >>>>> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in >>>>> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that? >>>>> That's basically an extra 3 month period. >>>>> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So >>>>> > quarterly release as usual? >>>>> > Thanks >>>> >>>> >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@spark.apache.org
