Takeshi, of course I used different HIVE_SERVER2_THRIFT_PORT
Jeff, thanks, I would try, but from your answer I'm getting the feeling,
that I'm trying some very rare case?

2016-07-01 10:54 GMT-07:00 Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>:

> This is not a bug, because these 2 processes use the same SPARK_PID_DIR
> which is /tmp by default.  Although you can resolve this by using
> different SPARK_PID_DIR, I suspect you would still have other issues like
> port conflict. I would suggest you to deploy one spark thrift server per
> machine for now. If stick to deploy multiple spark thrift server on one
> machine, then define different SPARK_CONF_DIR, SPARK_LOG_DIR and
> SPARK_PID_DIR for your 2 instances of spark thrift server. Not sure if
> there's other conflicts. but please try first.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Egor Pahomov <pahomov.e...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I get
>>
>> "org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.HiveThriftServer2 running as
>> process 28989.  Stop it first."
>>
>> Is it a bug?
>>
>> 2016-07-01 10:10 GMT-07:00 Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> I don't think the one instance per machine is true.  As long as you
>>> resolve the conflict issue such as port conflict, pid file, log file and
>>> etc, you can run multiple instances of spark thrift server.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Egor Pahomov <pahomov.e...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, I'm using Spark Thrift JDBC server and 2 limitations are really
>>>> bother me -
>>>>
>>>> 1) One instance per machine
>>>> 2) Yarn client only(not yarn cluster)
>>>>
>>>> Are there any architectural reasons for such limitations? About
>>>> yarn-client I might understand in theory - master is the same process as a
>>>> server, so it makes some sense, but it's really inconvenient - I need a lot
>>>> of memory on my driver machine. Reasons for one instance per machine I do
>>>> not understand.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Sincerely yoursEgor Pakhomov*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>> Jeff Zhang
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> *Sincerely yoursEgor Pakhomov*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> Jeff Zhang
>



-- 


*Sincerely yoursEgor Pakhomov*

Reply via email to