Hi,

Sounds like a quite involved development for me. I can't help here.
I'd suggest going through the dev and user mailing lists for the past
year and JIRA issues regarding the issue as I vaguely remember some
discussions about logging in Spark (that would merit to do the
migration to logback eventually).

Pozdrawiam,
Jacek Laskowski
----
https://medium.com/@jaceklaskowski/
Mastering Apache Spark 2.0 https://bit.ly/mastering-apache-spark
Follow me at https://twitter.com/jaceklaskowski


On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Mendelson, Assaf
<assaf.mendel...@rsa.com> wrote:
> Shading doesn’t help (we already shaded everything).
>
> According to https://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings only one
> binding can be used. The problem is that once we link to spark jars then we
> automatically inherit spark’s binding (for log4j).
>
> I would like to find a way to either send spark’s logs to log4j and my logs
> to logback or send everything to logback.
>
> Assaf.
>
>
>
> From: Jacek Laskowski [mailto:ja...@japila.pl]
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 12:47 AM
> To: Mendelson, Assaf
> Cc: user
> Subject: Re: using an alternative slf4j implementation
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Shading conflicting dependencies?
>
>
>
> Jacek
>
>
>
> On 5 Feb 2017 3:56 p.m., "Mendelson, Assaf" <assaf.mendel...@rsa.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Spark seems to explicitly use log4j.
>
> This means that if I use an alternative backend for my application (e.g.
> ch.qos.logback) I have a conflict.
>
> Sure I can exclude logback but that means my application cannot use our
> internal tools.
>
>
>
> Is there a way to use logback as a backend logging while using spark?
>
> Assaf.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to