as a workaround turn off pruning :

spark.sql.hive.metastorePartitionPruning false
spark.sql.hive.convertMetastoreParquet false

see 
https://github.com/awslabs/aws-glue-data-catalog-client-for-apache-hive-metastore/issues/45

On Tue Aug 24, 2021 at 9:18 AM CEST, Gourav Sengupta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I received a response from AWS, this is an issue with EMR, and they are
> working on resolving the issue I believe.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Gourav Sengupta
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:35 PM Gourav Sengupta <
> gourav.sengupta.develo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > the query still gives the same error if we write "SELECT * FROM table_name
> > WHERE data_partition > CURRENT_DATE() - INTERVAL 10 DAYS".
> >
> > Also the queries work fine in SPARK 3.0.x, or in EMR 6.2.0.
> >
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Gourav Sengupta
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:16 PM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Date handling was tightened up in Spark 3. I think you need to compare to
> >> a date literal, not a string literal.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 5:12 AM Gourav Sengupta <
> >> gourav.sengupta.develo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> while I am running in EMR 6.3.0 (SPARK 3.1.1) a simple query as "SELECT
> >>> * FROM <table_name> WHERE <date parition field> > '2021-03-01'" the query
> >>> is failing with error:
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> pyspark.sql.utils.AnalysisException:
> >>> org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.api.InvalidObjectException: Unsupported
> >>> expression '2021 - 03 - 01' (Service: AWSGlue; Status Code: 400; Error
> >>> Code: InvalidInputException; Request ID:
> >>> dd3549c2-2eeb-4616-8dc5-5887ba43dd22; Proxy: null)
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> The above query works fine in all previous versions of SPARK.
> >>>
> >>> Is this the expected behaviour in SPARK 3.1.1? If so can someone please
> >>> let me know how to write this query.
> >>>
> >>> Also if this is the expected behaviour I think that a lot of users will
> >>> have to make these changes in their existing code making transition to
> >>> SPARK 3.1.1 expensive I think.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Gourav Sengupta
> >>>
> >>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to