Thank you for your answer, but.

1) This sounds ok, but in other words it means the first delayed check is not possible to be done.

2) Start of init script? I follow lsb scripts from distribution, so there is not way to change them (I can change them, but with packages upgade they will go void). The is quite typical approach, how can I do HA for atlassian for example? Jira loads 5minutes..



Dne 12.8.2015 v 16:14 Nekrasov, Alexander napsal(a):
1. Pacemaker will/may call a monitor before starting a resource, in which case 
it expects a NOT_RUNNING response. It's just checking assumptions at that point.

2. A resource::start must only return when resource::monitor is successful. 
Basically the logic of a start() must follow this:

start() {
   start_daemon()
   while ! monitor() ; do
       sleep some
   done
   return $OCF_SUCCESS
}

-----Original Message-----
From: Miloš Kozák [mailto:milos.ko...@lejmr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:03 AM
To: users@clusterlabs.org
Subject: [ClusterLabs] Delayed first monitoring

Hi,

I have set up and CoroSync+CMAN+Pacemaker at CentOS 6.5 in order to
provide high-availability of opennebula. However, I am facing to a
strange problem which raises from my lack of knowleadge..

In the log I can see that when I create a resource based on an init
script, typically:

pcs resource create httpd lsb:httpd

The httpd daemon gets started, but monitor is initiated at the same time
and the resource is identified as not running. This behaviour makes
sense since we realize that the daemon starting takes some time. In this
particular case, I get error code 2 which means that process is running,
but environment is not locked. The effect of this is that httpd resource
gets restarted.

My workaround is extra sleep in status function of the init script, but
I dont like this solution at all! Do you have idea how to tackle this
problem in a proper way? I expected an op attribut which would specify
delay after service start and first monitoring, but I could not find
it..

Thank you, Milos


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to