-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu> 
Datum: 22.06.2016  21:23  (GMT+01:00) 
An: users@clusterlabs.org 
Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] design question to DRBD 

On 06/22/2016 02:13 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> 

> I'm thinking about starting drbd and the ocfs fs by init. I don't see the 
> strong need having it controlled by pacemaker.
> But of course the mix is more difficult to maintain.

Are you going to use active-active drbd with a cluster filesystem?
Otherwise it'll be mounted on one node only and you can't run your
webapp on the other as documentroot etc. are not available 
I'm thinking about active/active. But i think active/passive with a non-cluster 
fs is less complicated. 
Bernd

Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen
Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH)
Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1
85764 Neuherberg
www.helmholtz-muenchen.de
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzende: MinDir'in Baerbel Brumme-Bothe
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Prof. Dr. Guenther Wess, Dr. Alfons Enhsen, Renate Schlusen 
(komm.)
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 6466
USt-IdNr: DE 12952167
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to