On 07/04/2016 03:52 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 01.07.2016 18:26, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > [...] > >> You're right, "parameters" or "params" would be more consistent with >> existing usage. "Instance attributes" is probably the most technically >> correct term. I'll vote for "reload-params" > > May be "reconfigure" fits better? This would at least introduce an > action name which does not intersect with LSB/systemd/etc. > > "reload" is for service itself as admin would expect, "reconfigure" is > for its controlling resource. > > [...]
I like "reconfigure", but then the new parameter attribute should be "reconfigurable", which could be confusing. "All my parameters are reconfigurable!" I suppose we could call the attribute "change_triggers_reconfigure". _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
