I'm mostly interested in prventing false-positive cluster failovers that might occur during manual network maintenance (for example, testing switch and link outages).
>> Thanks for the clarification. So what's the easiest way to ensure that the >> cluster waits a >> desired timeout before deciding that a re-convergence is > necessary? >By raising the token (lost) timeout I would say. >Please correct my (Chrissie) but I see the token (lost) timout somehow as >resilience against static delays + jitter on top and the >token_retransmits_before_loss_const >as resilience against packet-loss. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
