On 11/22/2016 04:39 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote: > Using "shadow cib" in crmsh looks like a good idea, but it doesn't work > with node attributes set into "status" section of Pacemaker config. > I wonder it it is possible to make it work that way.
Forgot to mention -- the shadow CIB is probably the best way to do this. I don't know if there's a way to do it in crmsh, but you can use it with the low-level commands crm_shadow and crm_attribute --lifetime=reboot. > Ken, >>> start dampening timer > Could you please elaborate more on this. I don't get how I can set this > timer. > Do I need to set this timer for each node? > > > Thank you, > Kostia > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Ulrich Windl > <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de > <mailto:ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de>> wrote: > > >>> Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com <mailto:kgail...@redhat.com>> > schrieb am 18.11.2016 um 16:17 in Nachricht > <d6f449da-64f8-12ad-00be-e772d8e38...@redhat.com > <mailto:d6f449da-64f8-12ad-00be-e772d8e38...@redhat.com>>: > > On 11/18/2016 08:55 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote: > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> Is there a way to set a node attribute to the "status" section for few > >> nodes at the same time? > >> > >> In my case there is a node attribute which allows some resources to > >> start in the cluster if it is set. > >> If I set this node attribute for say two nodes in a way - one and then > >> another, than these resources are not distributed equally between these > >> two nodes. That because Pacemaker picks the first node to with this > >> attribute is set and immediately starts all allowed resources on it. > And > >> this is not the behavior i would like to get. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Kostia > > > > Not that I know of, but it would be a good feature to add to > > attrd_updater and/or crm_attribute. > > With crm (shell) you don't have transactions for node attributes, > but for the configuration. So if you add a location restriction > preventing any resources on your nodes, then enable the nodes, and > then delete the location restrictions in one transaction, you might > get what you want. It's not elegant, but itt ill do. > > To the crm shell maintainer: Is is difficult to build transactions > to node status changes? The problem I see is this: For configuration > you always have transactions (requiring "commit), but for nodes you > traditionally have non (effects are immediate). So you'd need a > thing like "start transaction" which requires a "commit" or some > kind of abort later. > > I also don't know whether a "shadow CIB" would help for the original > problem. > > Ulrich > > > > > You can probably hack it with a dampening value of a few seconds. If > > your rule checks for a particular value of the attribute, set all the > > nodes to a different value first, which will write that value and > start > > the dampening timer. Then set all the attributes to the desired value, > > and they will get written out together when the timer expires. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org